From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756262Ab0FIAUi (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:20:38 -0400 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:2854 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754349Ab0FIAUh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:20:37 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] MAINTAINERS: Add drivers/staging entries From: Joe Perches To: Greg KH Cc: Andrew Morton , Andrew Lunn , Jarod Wilson , Jakub Schmidtke , Henk de Groot , Naren Sankar , Jonathan Cameron , Pavel Machek , Luis Rodriguez , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Mori Hess , Steve Underwood , Simon Wunderlich , Arnaud Patard , Marek Lindner , Teddy Wang , Ossama Othman , Haiyang Zhang , Ian Abbott , Willy Tarreau , Scott Davilla , Scott Smedley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Forest Bond , David Rowe In-Reply-To: <20100609000713.GB16160@kroah.com> References: <20100608211246.GC10657@kroah.com> <1276032382.24044.23.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100609000713.GB16160@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:20:30 -0700 Message-ID: <1276042830.24044.121.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 17:07 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:26:22PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 14:12 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:49:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > Some drivers/staging directories use a TODO file with email entries. > > > > Make the same entries in the normal MAINTAINERS file. > > > No, please don't do this. I don't want to clutter up the MAINTAINERS > > > file with staging stuff. > > It's not clutter when it helps get patches to the right reviewers > > or responsible parties. > That's my job as staging maintainer, right? Am I somehow not doing this > properly? You can take on all the jobs you want, but automated tools that allow others to perform those actions and simultaneously reduce individual workload are better. > > > I also found it a bit odd you didn't send these to the stable subsystem > > > maintainer, why? > > The MAINTAINERS patches are forward going, not historical. > What does that mean? It means that relatively few people are developing against old kernel versions and patches to MAINTAINERS rarely, if ever, need backporting.