From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@intel.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: TCP stream performance regression due to c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:18:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1277399934.2816.659.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33AB447FBD802F4E932063B962385B351F483A15@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Le vendredi 18 juin 2010 à 16:26 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin a écrit :
> More info about the testing:
> It's a loopback testing. We start one client netperf process to communicate with netserver process in a stream TCP testing. To reduce the cpu cache effect, we bind the 2 processes on 2 different physical cpus.
> #taskset -c 0 ./netserver
> #taskset -c 15 ./netperf -t TCP_STREAM -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -i 50,3 -I 99,5 -- -s 57344 -S 57344 -m 4096
>
Thanks guys
We corrected a proven vulnerability in network stack.
If you want better netperf results, just increase size of your sockets
buffers. 57344 is _very_ low for localhost communication, given lo MTU
is 16436.
As we also increased skb->truesize lately, you might also increase
buffer size regardless of this (net: sk_add_backlog() take rmem_alloc
into account) commit.
In my case, I saw following improvement :
Under huge stress from a multiqueue/RPS enabled NIC, a single flow udp
receiver can now process ~200.000 pps (instead of ~100 pps before the
patch) on a 8 core machine.
Thats a 200.000 % increase, in a situation no tuning was possible ;)
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Shi, Alex
> >>Sent: 2010年6月18日 15:17
> >>To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com; davem@davemloft.net
> >>Cc: Chen, Tim C; Zhang, Yanmin; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >>Subject: TCP stream performance regression due to
> >>c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6
> >>
> >>In our netperf testing, TCP_STREAM56 shows about 20% or more performance
> >>regression on WSM/NHM and tigerton machines. The testing boot up both
> >>netserver and client on localhost. The testing command like this:
> >>./snapshot_script_net TC_STREAM56 127.0.0.1
> >>
> >>We found the following commit causes this issue.
> >>c377411f2494a931ff7facdbb3a6839b1266bcf6
> >>Revert this commit will recover this regression on all machine.
> >>
> >>Regards!
> >>Alex
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-24 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-18 7:17 Alex,Shi
2010-06-18 8:26 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-06-24 17:18 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1277399934.2816.659.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®