mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: avoid using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code (nr_iowait_cpu) v4
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:39:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1277476773.32034.639.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100617062950.GA3979@swordfish>

On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 09:29 +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Fix
>    
>  BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: s2disk/3392

> The initial fix was to use get_cpu/put_cpu in nr_iowait_cpu.  However,
> Arjan stated that "the bug is that it needs to be nr_iowait_cpu(int cpu)".
> 
> This patch introduces nr_iowait_cpu(int cpu) and changes to its callers.
> 
> Arjan also pointed out that we can't use get_cpu/put_cpu in update_ts_time_stats
> since we "pick the current cpu, rather than the one denoted by ts" in that case.
> To match given *ts and cpu denoted by *ts we use new field in the struct tick_sched: int cpu.


> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> index b232ccc..db14691 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct tick_sched {
>  	unsigned long			check_clocks;
>  	enum tick_nohz_mode		nohz_mode;
>  	ktime_t				idle_tick;
> +	int				cpu;
>  	int				inidle;
>  	int				tick_stopped;
>  	unsigned long			idle_jiffies;

> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 1d7b9bc..1907037 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ static ktime_t last_jiffies_update;
>  
>  struct tick_sched *tick_get_tick_sched(int cpu)
>  {
> +	/*FIXME: Arjan van de Ven:
> +	 can we do this bit once, when the ts structure gets initialized?*/
> +	per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu).cpu = cpu;
>  	return &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
>  }

> @@ -161,7 +164,7 @@ update_ts_time_stats(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now, u64 *last_update_time)
>  	if (ts->idle_active) {
>  		delta = ktime_sub(now, ts->idle_entrytime);
>  		ts->idle_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->idle_sleeptime, delta);
> -		if (nr_iowait_cpu() > 0)
> +		if (nr_iowait_cpu(ts->cpu) > 0)
>  			ts->iowait_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->iowait_sleeptime, delta);
>  		ts->idle_entrytime = now;
>  	}


This all seems extremely silly, why not something like:

---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 5f171f0..1363d3a 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -154,14 +154,14 @@ static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(ktime_t now)
  * Updates the per cpu time idle statistics counters
  */
 static void
-update_ts_time_stats(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now, u64 *last_update_time)
+update_ts_time_stats(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now, u64 *last_update_time)
 {
 	ktime_t delta;
 
 	if (ts->idle_active) {
 		delta = ktime_sub(now, ts->idle_entrytime);
 		ts->idle_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->idle_sleeptime, delta);
-		if (nr_iowait_cpu() > 0)
+		if (nr_iowait_cpu(cpu) > 0)
 			ts->iowait_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->iowait_sleeptime, delta);
 		ts->idle_entrytime = now;
 	}
@@ -175,19 +175,19 @@ static void tick_nohz_stop_idle(int cpu, ktime_t now)
 {
 	struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
 
-	update_ts_time_stats(ts, now, NULL);
+	update_ts_time_stats(cpu, ts, now, NULL);
 	ts->idle_active = 0;
 
 	sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(0);
 }
 
-static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(struct tick_sched *ts)
+static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
 {
 	ktime_t now;
 
 	now = ktime_get();
 
-	update_ts_time_stats(ts, now, NULL);
+	update_ts_time_stats(cpu, ts, now, NULL);
 
 	ts->idle_entrytime = now;
 	ts->idle_active = 1;
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time)
 	if (!tick_nohz_enabled)
 		return -1;
 
-	update_ts_time_stats(ts, ktime_get(), last_update_time);
+	update_ts_time_stats(cpu, ts, ktime_get(), last_update_time);
 
 	return ktime_to_us(ts->idle_sleeptime);
 }
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *last_update_time)
 	if (!tick_nohz_enabled)
 		return -1;
 
-	update_ts_time_stats(ts, ktime_get(), last_update_time);
+	update_ts_time_stats(cpu, ts, ktime_get(), last_update_time);
 
 	return ktime_to_us(ts->iowait_sleeptime);
 }
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
 	 */
 	ts->inidle = 1;
 
-	now = tick_nohz_start_idle(ts);
+	now = tick_nohz_start_idle(cpu, ts);
 
 	/*
 	 * If this cpu is offline and it is the one which updates


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-25 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-13 20:33 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code: s2disk Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-13 20:33 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-13 23:36   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-14 14:09     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-14 14:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-14 14:38       ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-14 14:54         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-14 15:01           ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-14 15:17             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-15  3:40               ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-15  6:19                 ` [PATCH] avoid using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code (nr_iowait_cpu) Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-15 14:24                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-15 14:50                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-15 15:08                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-15 15:23                         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-15 15:31                           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-15 16:13                         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-16  6:05                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-16  9:34                             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-17  6:29                         ` [PATCH] cpuidle: avoid using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code (nr_iowait_cpu) v4 Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-17  6:43                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-17  6:59                           ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-17  7:04                             ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-17  7:34                             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-06-25 14:39                           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-06-30 19:58                             ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-01  6:17                               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-07-01  7:07                               ` [PATCH] sched: Cure nr_iowait_cpu() users Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-01  8:18                                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-07-01  8:45                                 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1277476773.32034.639.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®