From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752572Ab0GGFng (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2010 01:43:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:47037 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751879Ab0GGFnf (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2010 01:43:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=k+l4jQiC2WxrtP4UmS/4zlmnEfl4/FXJVc90iq3K6AnWtitPQuR0npt37YxTR6+V0p DGDfrNo7Q1/fVU0OP+XBVDXVOOFW9dU7i20/cBCkAoQ3Yc7LgxAilJbV1I7KcezIk+0S D/rRIsQM0gT1wcZnRs/s7NqMVrtUfC0B8VNBU= Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: et131x: fix coding style issues in et131x_initpci.c From: Joe Eloff Reply-To: kagen101@gmail.com To: Alan Cox Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , devel , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <20100706222954.432ffcdd@linux.intel.com> References: <1278436628.5396.75.camel@dermezel> <20100706222954.432ffcdd@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:43:14 +0200 Message-ID: <1278481394.5396.88.camel@dermezel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 22:29 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:17:08 +0200 > Joe Eloff wrote: > > > >From e23e19537c4d62bc76ae982859d3c3225a45d9c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > > >2001 > > From: Joe Eloff > > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 19:13:28 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] Staging: et131x: fix coding style issues in > > et131x_initpci.c > > > > This is a patch to the et131x_initpci.c file that fixes up all the > > line lengths over 80 by the checkpatch.pl tool. > > That is one area where checkpatch can be misleading. If you split > messages like that it becomes hard to grep for them. > > Where it is useful is where you have > > printk("blah blah bah blah [120 chars]", functioncall(foo)) > > and it would hide things like functioncall(foo) > > No argument about the comment ones however. Noted and understand why you would want to grep and output when debugging. Will make better judgement calls thanks to these messages. Regards, Joe