From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966452Ab0GSSmw (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:42:52 -0400 Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:64717 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965430Ab0GSSms (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:42:48 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6048"; a="47949756" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] posix-timers: Refactoring of CPUCLOCK* macros From: Daniel Walker To: Tomasz Buchert Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stanislaw Gruszka , Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <1279539289-27628-2-git-send-email-tomasz.buchert@inria.fr> References: <1279539289-27628-1-git-send-email-tomasz.buchert@inria.fr> <1279539289-27628-2-git-send-email-tomasz.buchert@inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:42:42 -0700 Message-ID: <1279564962.21763.8.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 13:34 +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > This is merely a preparation to introduce wall time > clocks for threads/processes. All occurences of > CPUCLOCK* macros were replaced by CLOCK*. It seems like it would be better to make this naming more specific that less. Couldn't you say "POSIX_CLOCK" or something like that? Daniel -- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.