From: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] alpha: Implement HW performance events on the EV67 and later CPUs.
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:29:38 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280226579-6117-1-git-send-email-mcree@orcon.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272958808.5605.126.camel@twins>
On 04/05/10 19:40, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 11:55 +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
>> +/* I wonder what this is for ??? */
>> +void set_perf_event_pending(void)
>> +{
>> +}
>
> If the PMU Interrupt comes in as an NMI we cannot take locks and such
> from its handler. So what we do is queue that work to be ran later. The
> kernel has a fallback to run this stuff from the timer hardirq, but if
> the PMI is IRQ context (like ARM) you can simply call
> perf_event_do_pending() at its tail.
>
> Alternatively you can self-IPI like x86 does and run
> perf_event_do_pending() from there.
OK, I couldn't see how to self-IPI on the Apha (there is no obvious way in
the Alpha arch code, and the Alpha HW Ref. Man. only describes such a
feature being supported by the PALcode for OpenVMS which we are obviously
not running) and the PMI on Alpha is at such a high priority there is no
chance that the lock can be freed while in the PMI handler, so I have put
the call to perf_event_do_pending() in the timer interrupt, but unlike the
PowerPC code I don't know any tricks to force the timer interrupt to happen
early when there is pending work, so there is a potential maximum delay of
1ms from pending work being notified to calling perf_event_do_pending(). Is
this delay acceptable?
I also fix a nasty, but heretofore hidden, bug that could completely lock up
a machine with continuous PMIs due to a throttled PMC being accidently
re-enabled by the other PMC. It only showed up when I set the NMI flag true
in the call to perf_event_overflow() and had two events counting
simultaneously with a very short sample period.
I also see the x86 and Sparc code in 2.6.35 have reimplemented
the call to hw_perf_group_sched_in() in terms of new functions start_txn(),
cancel_txn() and commit_txn(). Is this change necessary to get the Alpha
code accepted for 2.6.36? If so it would be helpful if I could have a brief
description of what each function does.
The updated patch follows this message.
Cheers
Michael.
Michael Cree (1):
alpha: Implement HW performance events on the EV67 and later CPUs.
arch/alpha/include/asm/perf_event.h | 8 +-
arch/alpha/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
arch/alpha/kernel/irq_alpha.c | 3 +
arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c | 842 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/alpha/kernel/time.c | 26 ++
5 files changed, 879 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-27 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-30 23:55 [PATCH 0/3] alpha: Implement Hardware Performance Events Michael Cree
2010-04-30 23:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] alpha: Add performance monitor interrupt counter Michael Cree
2010-04-30 23:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] alpha: Add wrperfmon.h header file to aid use of wrperfmon PALcall Michael Cree
2010-04-30 23:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] alpha: Implement HW performance events on the EV67 and later CPUs Michael Cree
2010-05-04 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-24 21:58 ` Michael Cree
2010-07-27 10:29 ` Michael Cree [this message]
2010-07-27 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/3 V2] " Michael Cree
2010-07-28 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-28 20:52 ` Michael Cree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1280226579-6117-1-git-send-email-mcree@orcon.net.nz \
--to=mcree@orcon.net.nz \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®