From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Fix warnings in __mark_inode_dirty
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:04:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280250301-17603-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
Hi,
patches below fix (some of) warnings in __mark_inode_dirty complaining about
unregistered BDI (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312). The
issue is that device inodes describing non-writeable BDI can still get dirty
but they would be filed to writeback lists of these non-writeable BDI's.
Normally, we would just silently throw away the inode modification (bug) but
some unwriteable BDI's (like the one of /dev/zero) aren't marked as such and so
the code in __mark_inode_dirty gets upset that writeback isn't properly setup
although BDI is writeable.
The solution is slightly hacky but it should be a reasonable short term
solution until we resolve the principial issue that device inode should be
written to a different BDI than inode's data. Christoph wrote he has some
ideas in this direction.
Honza
PS: There might be another issue in sd.c code triggering this warning --- BDI
is registered from async callback (add_disk() called from sd_probe_async())
which might happen after userspace tries to access the device if I'm right.
At least this is the only explanation I have for some of the warnings.
next reply other threads:[~2010-07-27 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-27 17:04 Jan Kara [this message]
2010-07-27 17:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] bdi: Use parent filesystem BDI for inodes not capable of writeback Jan Kara
2010-07-27 17:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-27 17:24 ` Jan Kara
2010-07-27 17:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-27 18:01 ` Jan Kara
2010-07-27 20:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-27 20:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-27 20:44 ` Jan Kara
2010-07-27 20:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-29 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-29 12:17 ` Jan Kara
2010-07-27 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] char: Mark /dev/zero and /dev/kmem as " Jan Kara
2010-07-27 17:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] bdi: Initialize noop_backing_dev_info properly Jan Kara
2010-07-27 17:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-27 17:17 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1280250301-17603-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®