mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MEMSTICK: Add driver for Ricoh R5C592 Card reader.
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:56:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281336964.16637.13.camel@maxim-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <397573.48417.qm@web37608.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 23:31 -0700, Alex Dubov wrote: 
> > 
> > I currently assume that if I set req->need_card_int, the
> > driver will
> > wait till device raises MEMSTICK_INT_CED regardless of
> > serial/parallel
> > mode. This bit is always available on serial line.
> > Is that OK to assume?
> 
> I'm not quite sure about this question.
> Normally, when you wait for the media interrupt, you want to see the whole
> value of the INT register (CED by itself doesn't indicate successful
> command completion; in fact it's value is undefined in presence of other
> INT flags, like BREQ or CMDNK). In parallel mode, host is required to
> fetch all meaningful INT bits from the media bus, while in serial mode
> this is only possible, if host supports automatic INT retrieval (the host
> will issue GET_INT tpc behind the scenes before alerting the software).
Ok, maybe I didn't explain myself correctly.

Device is in serial mode.
I set need_card_int
I send a command.
<here I assume that driver waits for CED bit, which is exposed on data
line, if CED won't be set, driver/hardware will timeout>
I send GET_INT _once_, look at flags. If I see CED, no NACK, then ok,
otherwise I send error result.



> 
> > 
> > Another thing that I want to ask is about writes to
> > overwrite/managment
> > flag.
> > Common sense tells me that I can write the flash many
> > times, but write
> > can only clear bits. Therefore if I write 0xFF, this just
> > means do
> > nothing.
> > Probably same applies to data content, but that isn't much
> > of the use.
> 
> Yes, all memsticks are NAND flash, so writing 1s has no effect whatsoever.
> 
> > Thats why I see that default (good) value of bits in
> > overwrite flag is
> > 1.
> > This is correct I assume?
> 
> Yes, a direct consequence of the above.

I suspect that managment flag also has default value of 0xFF, and these
'special' features (drm, boot block, temporary table) clear bits out of
it.

> 
> > 
> > 
> > Another interesting thing I observed was that
> > MEMSTICK_INT_ERR can mean
> > a correctable error,  therefore it shouldn't
> > alone  reject read/write of
> > a sector. (I think that it means that one of
> > MEMSTICK_STATUS1_UCFG..MEMSTICK_STATUS1_DTER is set)
> > Same question about this.
> > 
> 
> There are three groups of error flags. While overwrite_flag register is
> accessible as part of extra data, being the indicator of block goodness
> it earned its own error flag:
> 
> DTER (UCDT) - error (uncorrectable) in data area
> EXER (UCEX) - error (uncorrectable) in extra data area
> FGER (UCFG) - error (uncorrectable) in overwrite_flag register
> 
> Uncorrectable error means that you've got some bit errors in the data
> you've obtained from the media. If uncorrectable flag is not set, it
> means that media's ECC circuit managed to correct the bit flip. The
> desired way of action is, of course, to reallocate the block before it
> develops an uncorrectable failure.
That I understand clearly.
I ask what the meaning of MEMSTICK_INT_ERR is.
I expect it to be set if any of (un) correctable errors are found.
Therefore if MEMSTICK_INT_ERR, I can't report error instantly, but I
need to look at status1 to see if error is correctable or not.
This is correct?


Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-09  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-05  8:30 Alex Dubov
2010-08-05 11:20 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-05 11:48   ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-05 12:30     ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-05 17:47       ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-06  7:43         ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-06 10:56           ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-07 13:15             ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-07 15:58               ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-08 13:31                 ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-06  8:01       ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-05 12:46 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-06  7:59   ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-06 10:59     ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-07 13:12       ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-07 16:03         ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-08 13:33           ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-07 20:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-08 14:26   ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-08 15:07     ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-08 20:08       ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-09  6:31         ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-09  6:56           ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2010-08-09 15:30           ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-10  8:12             ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-10  9:47               ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-11  8:08                 ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-11  8:32                   ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-12  7:22                     ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-12  7:58                       ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-12  7:27                     ` JMicron chipset update Alex Dubov
2010-08-09 19:19           ` [PATCH 2/2] MEMSTICK: Add driver for Ricoh R5C592 Card reader Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-10  7:53             ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-10  9:50               ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-11  8:16                 ` Alex Dubov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-09  2:39 MEMSTICK: Add my 2 drivers Maxim Levitsky
2010-12-09  2:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] memstick: Add driver for Ricoh R5C592 card reader Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-03 14:53 [PATCH 0/2] Driver for Ricoh cardreader Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] MEMSTICK: Add driver for Ricoh R5C592 Card reader Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-04  7:57   ` Alex Dubov
2010-08-04 16:48     ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-08-04 19:31       ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1281336964.16637.13.camel@maxim-laptop \
    --to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oakad@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®