From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: save the hash of the tuple in the original direction for latter use
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:01:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282035715.2448.24.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinuUuZSqEzfQAF422x2gYsVLzFQtXZKNLhgw+9g@mail.gmail.com>
Le mardi 17 août 2010 à 16:46 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Three variables ?
> >
> > static atomic_t rnd __read_mostly;
> >
> > if (unlikely(!atomic_read(&rnd))) {
> > unsigned int val;
> >
> > get_random_bytes(&val, sizeof(val));
> > if (!val)
> > val = 1;
> > atomic_cmpxchg(&rnd, 0, val);
> > }
> >
>
>
> Good idea. However, atomic_t is a volatile variable, and it prevent
> ILP. I think maybe it hurts the likely case. cmpxchg() is an atomic
> operations, so is the bellow code better?
>
I am not sure what you mean by ILP.
On x86, reading twice same memory location is faster than
reading it and store in temp variable (on stack)
reading from stack
> static unsigned long rnd __read_mostly;
>
> if (unlikely(!rnd)) {
> unsigned long val;
>
> get_random_bytes(&val, sizeof(val));
> if (!val)
> val = 1;
> cmpxchg(&rnd, 0, val);
> }
>
> Thanks.
>
I am not sure we must use a long (we really need 4 bytes only), and last
time I tried to use cmpxchg(), I was being told it was not available on
all arches.
But seeing it used in kernel/pid.c, maybe its not true anymore (that is,
__HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG is always defined to 1)
Since its a recent change (in kernel/pid.c), I would wait a bit and see
if an arch maintainer complains ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-17 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 7:16 Changli Gao
2010-08-17 8:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-17 8:46 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-17 9:01 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-08-17 9:32 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-19 3:59 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-19 12:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-08-19 15:31 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282035715.2448.24.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®