From: "Fenghua Yu" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Rudolf Marek" <r.marek@assembler.cz>,
"Huaxu Wan" <huaxu.wan@intel.com>,
"H Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Chen Gong" <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"Jean Delvare" <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp: Fix improper locking in CPU hot remove
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:53:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282172027-640-3-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282172027-640-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
When a sibling is added to dev_list after a cpu is hot-removed, pdev_list_mutex
has been locked already. But pkgtemp_device_add() tries to lock pdev_list_mutex
again. This is incorrect. The patch fixes this issue.
The patch also removes __cpuinit for pkgtemp_device_add() to avoid section
mismatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c
index 74157fc..928a016 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ struct pdev_entry {
static LIST_HEAD(pdev_list);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(pdev_list_mutex);
-static int __cpuinit pkgtemp_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
+static int pkgtemp_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
{
int err;
struct platform_device *pdev;
@@ -341,26 +341,34 @@ static void pkgtemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct pdev_entry *p, *n;
unsigned int i;
- int err;
- mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &pdev_list, list) {
if (p->cpu != cpu)
continue;
+ mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
platform_device_unregister(p->pdev);
list_del(&p->list);
kfree(p);
+ mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex);
+ /*
+ * Select one of removed cpu's siblings to represent sensor
+ * for this package.
+ * If there is no more running sibling in a package, the
+ * package sensor for this package is not available to user
+ * space any more.
+ */
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_core_mask(cpu)) {
+ int err;
+
if (i != cpu) {
err = pkgtemp_device_add(i);
if (!err)
break;
}
}
- break;
+ return;
}
- mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex);
}
static int __cpuinit pkgtemp_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
--
1.6.0.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-18 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-18 22:53 [PATCH] drivers/hwmon/coretemp: Fix incorrect hot-removed CPU's core sensor issue Fenghua Yu
2010-08-18 22:53 ` [PATCH] drivers/hwmon/coretemp: Remove warnings of unused variables Fenghua Yu
2010-08-19 7:24 ` Jean Delvare
2010-08-19 19:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-19 21:26 ` Jean Delvare
2010-08-19 21:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-08-19 21:32 ` Jean Delvare
2010-08-19 21:51 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2010-09-04 12:39 ` Jean Delvare
2010-09-04 14:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2010-09-04 16:17 ` Jean Delvare
2010-08-18 22:53 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2010-08-19 17:07 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] drivers/hwmon/coretemp: Fix incorrect hot-removed CPU's core sensor issue Guenter Roeck
2010-08-20 8:26 ` Jean Delvare
2010-08-20 21:53 ` Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282172027-640-3-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huaxu.wan@intel.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=r.marek@assembler.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome