From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"chris@frostnet.net" <chris@frostnet.net>,
"debian00@aliceadsl.fr" <debian00@aliceadsl.fr>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"jonathan.protzenko@gmail.com" <jonathan.protzenko@gmail.com>,
"mans@mansr.com" <mans@mansr.com>,
"psastudio@mail.ru" <psastudio@mail.ru>,
"rjw@sisk.pl" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"stephan.eicher@web.de" <stephan.eicher@web.de>,
"sxxe@gmx.de" <sxxe@gmx.de>,
"thomas@archlinux.org" <thomas@archlinux.org>,
"venki@google.com" <venki@google.com>,
"wonghow@gmail.com" <wonghow@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] sched: move sched_avg_update() to update_cpu_load()
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:51:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282265478.10905.1.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281987086.1926.1890.camel@laptop>
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 12:31 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 10:46 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> > There is no guarantee that the original cpu won't be doing this in
> > parallel with nohz idle load balancing cpu.
>
> Hmm, true.. bugger.
>
> > > > Fix it by moving the sched_avg_update() to more appropriate update_cpu_load()
> > > > where the CFS load gets updated aswell.
> > >
> > > Right, except it breaks things a bit, at the very least you really need
> > > that update right before reading it, otherwise you can end up with >100%
> > > fractions, which are odd indeed ;-)
> >
> > with the patch, the update always happens before reading it. isn't it?
> >
> > update now happens during the scheduler tick (or during nohz load
> > balancing tick). And the load balancer gets triggered with the tick.
> > So the update (at the tick) should happen before reading it (used by
> > load balancing triggered by the tick). Am I missing something?
>
> We run the load-balancer in softirq context, on -rt that's a task, and
> we could have ran other (more important) RT tasks between the hardirq
> and the softirq running, which would increase the rt_avg and could thus
> result in >100%.
>
> But I think we can simply retain the sched_avg_update(rq) in
> sched_rt_avg_update(), that is ran with rq->lock held and should be
> enough to avoid that case.
>
> We can retain the other bit of you patch, moving sched_avg_update() from
> scale_rt_power() to update_cpu_load(), since that is only concerned with
> lowering the average when there is no actual activity.
Ok. Updated patch appended. Thanks.
---
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: sched: move sched_avg_update() to update_cpu_load()
Currently sched_avg_update() (which updates rt_avg stats in the rq) is getting
called from scale_rt_power() (in the load balance context) which doesn't take
rq->lock.
Fix it by moving the sched_avg_update() to more appropriate update_cpu_load()
where the CFS load gets updated aswell.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 3 ++-
kernel/sched_fair.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: tree/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- tree.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ tree/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -2268,8 +2268,6 @@ unsigned long scale_rt_power(int cpu)
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
u64 total, available;
- sched_avg_update(rq);
-
total = sched_avg_period() + (rq->clock - rq->age_stamp);
available = total - rq->rt_avg;
Index: tree/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- tree.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ tree/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3182,6 +3182,8 @@ static void update_cpu_load(struct rq *t
this_rq->cpu_load[i] = (old_load * (scale - 1) + new_load) >> i;
}
+
+ sched_avg_update(this_rq);
}
static void update_cpu_load_active(struct rq *this_rq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-20 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-13 19:45 [patch 0/3] sched: fixes related to scaling down cpu power with RT tasks Suresh Siddha
2010-08-13 19:45 ` [patch 1/3] sched: init rt_avg stat whenever rq comes online Suresh Siddha
2010-08-16 7:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 17:36 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-16 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-17 8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 0:20 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-19 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 0:03 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-20 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 14:16 ` [tip:sched/urgent] x86, tsc, sched: Recompute cyc2ns_offset's during resume from sleep states tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2010-08-13 19:45 ` [patch 2/3] sched: fix minimum power returned by update_cpu_power() Suresh Siddha
2010-08-16 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 17:37 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-13 19:45 ` [patch 3/3] sched: move sched_avg_update() to update_cpu_load() Suresh Siddha
2010-08-16 8:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-16 17:46 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-08-16 19:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 0:51 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2010-08-20 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-23 20:42 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-09-09 19:45 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Move " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282265478.10905.1.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=chris@frostnet.net \
--cc=debian00@aliceadsl.fr \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jonathan.protzenko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=psastudio@mail.ru \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stephan.eicher@web.de \
--cc=sxxe@gmx.de \
--cc=thomas@archlinux.org \
--cc=venki@google.com \
--cc=wonghow@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®