From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
acme@infradead.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] mce: Add persistent events
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:54:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283352865.2356.29.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100901061402.GA22874@elte.hu>
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 08:14 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> More generally i agree with you that better modularization helps - a
> nice improvement in this area would be to do a kernel/perf_event/
> splitup: i.e. split kernel/perf_event.c (which is getting a tad big)
> into:
>
> kernel/events/output.c
> kernel/events/trace.c
> kernel/events/core.c
> kernel/events/syscall.c
> kernel/events/persistent.c
>
> Maybe even move hw_breakpoint.c there, etc. There's already various
> wrappers in perf_event.c that could be split out of the core code to
> increase modularity. Later on we could have a sysfs.c, etc.
>
> Any taker for such a massive restructuring? :)
I'm willing to help out. Just need to get past all the confs I seemed to
be going to lately. I feel I'm traveling once a month. Of course my
recent vacations did not help any ;-)
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-06 14:25 [RFC PATCH 00/9] RAS daemon prototype, v2 Borislav Petkov
2010-08-06 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] x86, mce: Notify about corrected events too Borislav Petkov
2010-08-06 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] amd64_edac: Remove polling mechanism Borislav Petkov
2010-08-06 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] perf_events: Export an assortment of functions Borislav Petkov
2010-08-06 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] mce: Add persistent events Borislav Petkov
2010-08-06 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-09-01 0:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-09-01 6:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-01 14:54 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2010-08-06 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] perf: Move trace stuff into tools/lib/trace Borislav Petkov
2010-09-01 0:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-09-01 8:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-09-01 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-08-06 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] perf: Export debugfs utilities Borislav Petkov
2010-08-06 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] perf: Export cpumap Borislav Petkov
2010-08-06 14:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-08-06 14:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-08-06 15:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-08-06 16:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-08-06 21:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-08-06 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] perf: Carve out mmap helpers for general use Borislav Petkov
2010-08-06 14:25 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] tools, ras: Add a RAS daemon Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1283352865.2356.29.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®