From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758730Ab0IHMqK (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 08:46:10 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:44202 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756295Ab0IHMqF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 08:46:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] Disable scheduler tick when we are running SCHED_FIFO tasks From: Peter Zijlstra To: Jan Blunck Cc: Linux-Kernel Mailinglist , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich , Michael Galbraith In-Reply-To: <1283948964-6418-4-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de> References: <1283948964-6418-1-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de> <1283948964-6418-4-git-send-email-jblunck@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:45:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1283949943.23762.16.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 14:29 +0200, Jan Blunck wrote: > This patch is disabling the scheduler tick to go off when there is a task > with SCHED_FIFO policy running. Since these tasks are not timesliced anyway > we only care about timers, softirqs and such stuff just like when we disable > the tick during idle periods. > Also, doesn't this break any and all jiffies users? And you need to restart the tick on call_rcu() and everything else that requires the tick for processing.