From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753432Ab0IOMqV (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:46:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:50994 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753225Ab0IOMqS (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:46:18 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references; b=uKZJSHI276EMvgdM2I9JF1ZL4cvtkWLW6HbClMALigR6sITim/UVl+bfhFpaNHW9B4 akP+iOyHjBAEvpzTrJdjP3AivKs+k6vme2GnPXTviei0VovxQNr63vLLKwatK5LxuKfd XRpkk8XgFqQrPpNF0jtPiNS8rbetaj1VN3LLI= From: Namhyung Kim To: Jiri Kosina Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] ext2: trivial: fix a typo on comment in ext2/inode.c Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:46:02 +0900 Message-Id: <1284554762-13278-2-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.2.2 In-Reply-To: <1284554762-13278-1-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com> References: <1284554762-13278-1-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 'excpet' should be 'except'. 'ext3_get_branch' should be 'ext2_get_branch'. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim --- fs/ext2/inode.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c index 940c961..533699c 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ failed_out: * the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after * we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last * triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same - * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), excpet that in one + * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), except that in one * place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not * set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should * be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap. @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex); /* * If the indirect block is missing while we are reading - * the chain(ext3_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or + * the chain(ext2_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or * if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore, * (either because another process truncated this branch, or * another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if -- 1.7.2.2