From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756861Ab0IPWpR (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:45:17 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34229 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753180Ab0IPWpP (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:45:15 -0400 From: Jan Kara To: Jens@suse.cz, "Axboe , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/3] BDI handling fixes Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:44:08 +0200 Message-Id: <1284677051-28564-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.6.4.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, series of these three patches fixes the warning in __mark_inode_dirty() which happens when I do e.g. touch /dev/zero. The first two patches should be obvious enough and probably worth merging independently of the third patch. The third patch is upto a discussion whether we want to solve the problem that way or differently. Christoph, I know we spoke at LSF that inode_to_bdi() could be a per-sb method but the current version of the patch seems clean enough to me that we could maybe go even without the special callback? Honza