From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756095Ab0IYFvH (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2010 01:51:07 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:52165 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754788Ab0IYFvG (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Sep 2010 01:51:06 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,233,1283756400"; d="scan'208";a="610248035" Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / PCIe / AER: Disable native AER service if BIOS has precedence (v2) (was: Re: [PATCH] PCI / PCIe / AER ...) From: Huang Ying To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Chen Gong , Jesse Barnes , LKML , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Hidetoshi Seto , Kenji Kaneshige , Matthew Garrett , ACPI Devel Maling List In-Reply-To: <201009201850.00626.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <201009200002.15609.rjw@sisk.pl> <4C96FCA3.2060704@linux.intel.com> <201009201850.00626.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 13:51:02 +0800 Message-ID: <1285393862.15685.37.camel@yhuang-dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Rafael, On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 00:50 +0800, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_acpi.c > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_acpi.c > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ int pcie_port_acpi_setup(struct pci_dev > | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL; > > if (pci_aer_available()) { > - if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(port)) > + if (aer_acpi_firmware_first()) > dev_dbg(&port->dev, "PCIe errors handled by BIOS.\n"); > else > flags |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL; The original per-device firmware_first is overridden by the new global firmware_first? If it is, why keep the original per-device firmware_first? Best Regards, Huang Ying