From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932248Ab0I0FoF (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:44:05 -0400 Received: from crca.org.au ([74.207.252.120]:46620 "EHLO crca.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751374Ab0I0FoE (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:44:04 -0400 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000082 From: Nigel Cunningham To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM , LKML , TuxOnIce-devel Subject: Swsusp patches applied to suspend-2.6#linux-next Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:43:35 +1000 Message-Id: <1285566238-10966-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi again Rafael. As discussed, here are the patches, modified to apply against your current linux-next tree. A new first patch splits compression support out into its own file, removing the need to have two versions of the load_image and save_image routines, minimising the changes to the remainder of the patches and making things cleaner than would otherwise be the case. On my laptop, single-threaded compression actually slows writing down from 175MB/s to around 100-120MB/s (depending on how well the image compresses). Reading speed improves from 218MB/s to around 245MB/s. I expect that multithreaded writing would bring the writing (and reading) speeds back up. It's on my swsusp to do list :) Nigel