mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] x86: Barf when faults happen in NMI
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:30:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285615833-5324-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)

In x86, faults exit by executing the iret instruction, which then
reenables NMIs if we faulted in NMI context. Then if a fault
happens in NMI, another NMI can nest after the fault exits.

But we don't yet support nested NMIs because we have only one NMI
stack. To prevent that, trigger a bug when a fault happens in NMI
context.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---

I first thought about putting it in the vmalloc fault path only.
But then I saw more occasions for the kernel to fault (kmemcheck
or so), and so I thought it should be better put in the all in one
path. But I suspect you won't like that conditional in the big
x86 fault path.


 arch/x86/mm/fault.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 4c4508e..80c997e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -955,6 +955,8 @@ do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
 	int write;
 	int fault;
 
+	BUG_ON(in_nmi());
+
 	tsk = current;
 	mm = tsk->mm;
 
-- 
1.6.2.3


             reply	other threads:[~2010-09-27 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-27 19:30 Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-09-27 21:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-09-27 23:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-09-28 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-28 14:02   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1285615833-5324-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®