From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tcm: Add Thin Provisioning / UNMAP emulation and Block Limits VPD page
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:05:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285751156.18417.57.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1sk0taeal.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:55 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> writes:
>
> nab> This patch also adds the Block Limits VPD (0xb0) page
>
> You should add the Thin Provisioning VPD page as well and set TPU and/or
> TPWS.
>
Greetings mkp,
So I was looking at adding this VPD page orginally to set TPU=1 w/ DP=0
(because I don't believe there is currently way to get build the
PROVISIONING GROUP DESCRIPTORs from Block Discard knowledge), but I
ended getting a bit confused by the THRESHOLD EXPONENT, and what value
this should returned for the TCM/IBLOCK and TCM/FILEIO backstores when
blk_queue_discard()==1 is enabled.
Since this is currently not implemented in scsi_debug.c or used in any
way by sd.c AFAICT, do you have any additional information on how this
should be determined together with the UNMAP -> blk_issue_discard()
emulation bits..?
Thanks!
--nab
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-29 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 22:51 Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-28 18:55 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-09-29 9:05 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285751156.18417.57.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=konrad@darnok.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=realrichardsharpe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®