From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] poll(): add poll_wait_set_exclusive()
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:31:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286397096.6661.2.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101006190434.GA5783@Krystal>
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 15:04 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> For reference, here is the use-case: The user-space daemon runs typically one
> thread per cpu, each with a handle on many file descriptors. Each thread waits
> for data to be available using poll(). In order to follow the poll semantic,
> when data becomes available on a file descriptor, the kernel wakes up all
> threads at once, but in my case only one of them will successfully consume the
> data (all other thread's splice or read will fail with -ENODATA). With many
> threads, these useless wakeups add an unwanted overhead and scalability
> limitation.
Mathieu, I'm curious to why you have multiple threads reading the same
fd. Since the threads are per cpu, does the fd handle all CPUs? Or do
you have an fd per event per CPU, in which case the threads should just
poll off of their own fds.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-06 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-06 17:56 Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-10-06 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-06 19:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-10-06 19:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-07 16:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-10-31 23:02 ` Davide Libenzi
2010-10-06 20:31 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2010-10-07 17:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-10-07 17:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-10-07 18:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-10-07 20:44 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286397096.6661.2.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®