From: Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
To: Brett Rudley <brudley@broadcom.com>
Cc: "jcm@jonmasters.org" <jcm@jonmasters.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Henry Ptasinski <henryp@broadcom.com>,
Nohee Ko <noheek@broadcom.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [staging] brcm80211: fix radio disabled on attempt to bring up interface
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:17:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286911059.20957.5.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7A94256FD72B884D9E7C55586C3CBCEE1382808041@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:34 -0700, Brett Rudley wrote:
> > The brcm80211 driver does not correctly handle the case that the wireless
> > radio hardware is physically disabled during interface initialization. An
> > attempt is made to check whether the radio is disabled, and in the case
> > that it is, a background worker is setup to monitor for the radio coming
> > online, but the interface queues are incorrectly brought up anyway. The
> > value BCME_RADIOOFF should be returned in wlc_up in such error case.
> Signed-off-by: Brett Rudley <brudley@broadcom.com>
Thanks. The patch actually didn't use full paths to the staging tree
(was relative to the driver directory) because it was crazy late and my
brain was tired by the time I found the problem. You'll sort it out.
Anyway. So rfkill works with soft block/unblock, but doesn't seem to
correctly report the state of the physical button on this laptop. I
don't think that's your domain (as I said, I freely admit that I need to
find some time, sometime, to understand how rfkill is supposed to work).
What I do think is your domain is the fact that suspend/resume with this
driver isn't working. The system does suspend, and it does resume, but
the driver gets itself in a twist and never talks to the outside world
again - just keeps logging an error. I'll send you some debug info
tonight or in the next few days so we can get that fixed up too.
Can I ask, also, do you plan on cleaning up the WLC HIGH/LOW stuff or
adding some comments to the code so that people realize this is for
PCI/USB dongle stuff? I spent some time going through the code trying to
figure out what the WL_LOCK/UNLOCK stuff was about and why it was
missing in the case of a PCI device :) It seems like this driver is
partly based on generic code used in other drivers, and that's fine, but
I suspect some of it will need more cleanup before it is merged.
Jon.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-12 8:29 jcm
2010-10-12 18:34 ` Brett Rudley
2010-10-12 19:17 ` Jon Masters [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286911059.20957.5.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org \
--to=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=henryp@broadcom.com \
--cc=jcm@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noheek@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®