From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757555Ab0JSIze (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:55:34 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:36158 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752172Ab0JSIzd (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:55:33 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,349,1283756400"; d="scan'208";a="618119761" Subject: Re: [patch]x86: spread tlb flush vector between nodes From: Shaohua Li To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , lkml , "Chen, Tim C" In-Reply-To: <20101019084423.GB27723@elte.hu> References: <1286955698.13317.5.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com> <20101013081629.GA1621@basil.fritz.box> <1286959176.24888.6.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com> <1287466757.29515.2.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com> <6dd05e19-05ef-48e4-b42d-d18c913fa4d7@email.android.com> <20101019084423.GB27723@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:55:32 +0800 Message-ID: <1287478532.9456.0.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:44 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > Technically, it is way too late for anything new in this merge window, but we can > > try to make a reasonable assessment of the risk since the merge window got > > delayed. However, this close to the merge window you cannot just expect to be > > merged even if the patch itself is OK. > > a prompt re-send of the patch today-ish, with proper changelog, etc. and with the > new tuning in place is definitely a must. the previous patch has changelog. what did you mean a new tuning?