From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ring-buffer: Bind time extend and data events together
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:06:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287579993.16971.552.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010192244290.6815@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 22:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Suggested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > ---
> > include/linux/ring_buffer.h | 12 --
> > kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 283 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 2 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
>
> Is there no way to make this change a bit more finegrained,
> i.e. incremental patches ?
>
> Thanks,
There's probably a little I can add incrementally, but the main change
that this does is that the ring buffer can return either a data type or
time extend type (which has a data type appended to it).
Luckily, the interface to the ring buffer has all be encapsulated, so
the only changes need to be made in ring_buffer.[ch]. All interfaces
that take a event type needs to check if it is a data or time extend.
Which is why the patch looks so big. But these changes are contained in
this file.
But there's some clean ups that this patch did, I can pull them out and
submit again.
Thanks,
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-20 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-19 17:54 [PATCH 0/5] [GIT PULL] ring-buffer: Various optimizations Steven Rostedt
2010-10-19 17:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] ring-buffer: Make write slow path out of line Steven Rostedt
2010-10-19 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] ring-buffer: Bind time extend and data events together Steven Rostedt
2010-10-19 20:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-20 13:06 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2010-10-19 17:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] ring-buffer: Remove condition to add timestamp in fast path Steven Rostedt
2010-10-19 17:54 ` [PATCH 4/5] ring-buffer: Micro-optimize with some strategic inlining Steven Rostedt
2010-10-19 17:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] ring-buffer: Remove unused macro RB_TIMESTAMPS_PER_PAGE Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1287579993.16971.552.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®