From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757865Ab0JUMpn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:45:43 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.125]:57843 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752465Ab0JUMpm (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:45:42 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=6ptpMFIBtxRk0xdOb6IhJTbTLVRlKjWFes7R4SsWCrA= c=1 sm=0 a=LuwKl7ggZIAA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=VvixNBtZ7ssjy6iVYRwA:9 a=muDT2MM-ciBST79SeK5PSOeTTe8A:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL] tracing: Fix compile issue for trace_sched_wakeup.c From: Steven Rostedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Jason Baron , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Andrew Morton , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , 2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp In-Reply-To: <1287659008.3488.102.camel@twins> References: <1287508282.16971.386.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20101019184111.GA17266@elte.hu> <20101020154045.GA18353@elte.hu> <20101020164324.GC7348@redhat.com> <4CBFAC70.30602@hitachi.com> <1287645744.3488.57.camel@twins> <1287658862.16971.569.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1287659008.3488.102.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:45:39 -0400 Message-ID: <1287665139.16971.575.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 13:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 07:01 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Possibly, but wouldn't it make sense to batch up the work and simply > call stop_machine only once? I mean, if you already know you're going to > do this... That has actually been talked about. By adding some sort of trace_point_batch_enable(). But this is not the usual normal case. -- Steve