From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754536Ab0JYLce (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:32:34 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:55611 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751244Ab0JYLcd (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:32:33 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/18] ARM: LPAE: ensure dma_addr_t is the same size as phys_addr_t From: Catalin Marinas To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <201010251308.24063.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20101025085812.25275.55757.stgit@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20101025090046.25275.80297.stgit@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <201010251308.24063.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: ARM Limited Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:32:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1288006329.14756.13.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2010 11:32:09.0482 (UTC) FILETIME=[429DCEA0:01CB7438] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:08 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 25 October 2010, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > From: Will Deacon > > > > Now that phys_addr_t can be 64-bit on ARM, we must ensure that dma_addr_t > > is sufficiently large to hold physical addresses. > > > > This patch uses the types.h implementation in asm-generic to define the > > dma_addr_t type as the same width as phys_addr_t. > > > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon > > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas > > This patch will become obsolete once the "unify dma_addr_t typedef" > series from Fujita Tomonori is upstream, you will instead have to set > CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. Yes, I know this and it's on my list to fix once I update the patches to 2.6.37-rc1. Thanks, Catalin