From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759555Ab0JZOjT (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:39:19 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:44096 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755807Ab0JZOjS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:39:18 -0400 Subject: Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -8589361717 ns) in current git From: Peter Zijlstra To: Markus Trippelsdorf Cc: Borislav Petkov , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "hpa@linux.intel.com" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Andreas Herrmann In-Reply-To: <20101026135808.GB1672@arch.trippelsdorf.de> References: <20101026112052.GA1672@arch.trippelsdorf.de> <20101026131843.GC17852@aftab> <20101026135808.GB1672@arch.trippelsdorf.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:38:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1288103930.15336.321.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 15:58 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > > > This is strange, tsc is actually stable on your F10h revC. > > Yes. constant_tsc is among the CPU flags. constant_tsc only means the TSC is not affected by cpu freq changes. It has zero relevance to cross-cpu sync of the TSC. The clocksource stuff requires your TSC to be synchronous over all your CPUs.