From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759900Ab0JZPbj (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:31:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31289 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751937Ab0JZPbg (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:31:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] IMA: use rbtree instead of radix tree for inode information cache From: Eric Paris To: Linus Torvalds Cc: John Stoffel , Christoph Hellwig , "J.H." , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, zohar@us.ibm.com, david@fromorbit.com, jmorris@namei.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk In-Reply-To: References: <20101025184118.20504.24290.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> <19653.55494.240658.165153@quad.stoffel.home> <4CC5DCBB.1070505@kernel.org> <20101025205746.GA6568@infradead.org> <19654.57160.616600.480900@quad.stoffel.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:30:02 -0400 Message-ID: <1288107002.2655.102.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 08:22 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Did I miss any actual _constructive_ criticism of the patches? Is > there any reason I shouldn't actually apply them? If there is, I've > lost it in the roar of pointlessness. I think dchinner had some comments on what he might like to see in the long run to further improve the situation, but I don't think anything he requested or commented on precludes this series from being applied... -Eric