From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761416Ab0J2MSO (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:18:14 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:62403 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751890Ab0J2MSM (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:18:12 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=6ptpMFIBtxRk0xdOb6IhJTbTLVRlKjWFes7R4SsWCrA= c=1 sm=0 a=ygIiTo8ZIjQA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=20KFwNOVAAAA:8 a=yd-9aiblakt9m_ewWcMA:9 a=6JAf1Z1vT588NWI_XOci7J2jECsA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=jEp0ucaQiEUA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jump label: disable due to compiler bug From: Steven Rostedt To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jason Baron , David Daney , rth@redhat.com, "H. Peter Anvin" , mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, tglx@linutronix.de, andi@firstfloor.org, roland@redhat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, vgoyal@redhat.com, sam@ravnborg.org, tony@bakeyournoodle.com, dsd@laptop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20101029063450.GE29463@elte.hu> References: <2d1b1d5d2b3930e1acb063cefffbcb2faf049854.1288212486.git.jbaron@redhat.com> <20101028141757.GA2875@redhat.com> <4CC9C724.3020004@caviumnetworks.com> <20101028201112.GA4792@redhat.com> <20101029063450.GE29463@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:18:07 -0400 Message-ID: <1288354687.18238.433.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Jason Baron wrote: > > > Thus, I'm going to propose a patch, which makes jump label conditional on x86_64 > > for now [...] > > No, we dont do 64-bit only features really. > > > [...] (adding -maccumulate-outgoing-args to x86 increases the text size, so I'm > > not proposing adding the flag there). > > Please make jump labels configurable instead. (dependent on EMBEDDED) Do you mean to have it dependent on !EMBEDDED, or perhaps !CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE ? I can see people making a big stink about adding back a gcc option that makes the kernel bigger. -- Steve > > Also, could you please send the fix to me ASAP? We dont need confirmation and > re-confirmation and testing, as this thing is crashing on me several times every > single day ... > > I also know that 64-bit never crashed this way, nor did the 32-bit kernel with > function tracer enabled - so -maccumulate-outgoing-args will likely fix it. > > Lets get the ball rolling so we can get it to Linus today ...