From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762052Ab0J2WIU (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:08:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:49525 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755031Ab0J2WIS (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:08:18 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=QzCuK+Q1YDGs7VklPPVjXBNKS4DFFxE71bzJKzaZat8pMLZXpkfddW7yyQI5hxyufq GAC26qmORAKFW1AzuGeBbWxjpXSbb+XRhl4D39AzqzDYznXIcysF3GoTUVyvnbyrmnsq MyGthGpm63VBjwNQEB0A/LZDRclt4L3pusLjQ= Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: poll/select performance on datagram sockets From: Eric Dumazet To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Alban Crequy , "David S. Miller" , Stephen Hemminger , Cyrill Gorcunov , Alexey Dobriyan , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Pauli Nieminen , Rainer Weikusat In-Reply-To: References: <20101029191857.5f789d56@chocolatine.cbg.collabora.co.uk> <1288380431.2680.3.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1288386348.2680.25.camel@edumazet-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:08:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1288390092.2680.80.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 à 14:57 -0700, Davide Libenzi a écrit : > It is, though I am not sure that shuffling code around to chase false > sharing on very specific cases, is an approach worth following. > The new position of the table on the stack might share with another hot > line, under a different load. > Sure. Its only a start as I said. We should identify the shared portion and make sure it sits in a dedicated cache line.