From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754371Ab0J3OgE (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:36:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:51558 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753661Ab0J3OgA (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 10:36:00 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=dyFCXRAD8uDiEQfeziEDtp/AWzGfj8nOwn35/xnFVqjCuTprQfE77O3qqdnRkXODtm ZIe4EdX3R7ZxGLeFO5cv3+Rz0Yx/0+rF7DNcR+9B+/lz3XfPk/wxqk/X3zYyNrl0olfK Qv9TEFRSBrooZlKWP5O0LzIEG/KZQonuPTDo0= Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: core: sock: fix information leak to userland From: Eric Dumazet To: Vasiliy Kulikov Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , "Eric W. Biederman" , Herbert Xu , "Paul E. McKenney" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1288448801-6303-1-git-send-email-segooon@gmail.com> References: <1288448801-6303-1-git-send-email-segooon@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:35:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1288449350.2680.970.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le samedi 30 octobre 2010 à 18:26 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov a écrit : > "Address" variable might be not fully initialized in sock->ops->get_name(). > The only current implementation is get_name(), it leaves some padding > fields of sockaddr_tipc uninitialized. It leads to leaking of contents > of kernel stack memory. > > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov > --- > Compile tested. > > net/core/sock.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > index 3eed542..759dd81 100644 > --- a/net/core/sock.c > +++ b/net/core/sock.c > @@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, > { > char address[128]; > > + memset(&address, 0, sizeof(address)); > if (sock->ops->getname(sock, (struct sockaddr *)address, &lv, 2)) > return -ENOTCONN; > if (lv < len) ??? Please fix the real bug.