From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752007Ab0KDOiT (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:38:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:38479 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751475Ab0KDOiR (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:38:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=vMrRy50uM7x7DwLHOmMPfsDMrYiIYUgVMPMpkGgLXuw0I9AJHSr83Zg1+Bhr/8hG7f 93Tojf/ONnGugxjc+YrQLvAlfdee7PIzpnbIiuJyQQhtiQbnN78aVSj2aICWZXjyF9ec kys90GsT471zpebE5tqGhUv2M/mevXuu32nH4= Subject: Re: divide error in select_task_rq_fair() From: Eric Dumazet To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Nikhil Rao , Takuya Yoshikawa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20101104142853.GA11656@helgaas.com> References: <20101104041236.GA9389@helgaas.com> <1288847992.2718.37.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20101104142853.GA11656@helgaas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:37:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1288881474.2659.123.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le jeudi 04 novembre 2010 à 08:28 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas a écrit : > On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 06:19:52AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 22:12 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > With current upstream, I see the following crash at boot-time: > > > > > > Brought up 64 CPUs > > > Total of 64 processors activated (289366.52 BogoMIPS). > > > divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP > > > last sysfs file: > > > CPU 1 > > > Modules linked in: > > > > > > Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.37-rc1-00027-gff8b16d #271 /ProLiant DL980 G7 > > > RIP: 0010:[] [] select_task_rq_fair+0x62a/0x7a0 > > > > > > Complete dmesg below; let me know if you need more info. > > > > Is the machine runs OK if you build a kernel with NR_CPUS=128 ? > > Nope, it fails the same way with NR_CPUS=128. Dmesg below. Sorry, just try 256 or 512, it seems you have a pretty big machine ? 8 nodes, but only nodes from 0-3 are populated.