Re: [RFC 1/4]x86: cleanup vector usage

[Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>]

On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 04:55 +0800, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:44:18PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > Cleanup the vector usage and make them continuous if possible.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> > ---
> ...
> > -#define X86_PLATFORM_IPI_VECTOR		0xed
> > +#define X86_PLATFORM_IPI_VECTOR		0xf7
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * IRQ work vector:
> >   */
> > -#define IRQ_WORK_VECTOR			0xec
> > +#define IRQ_WORK_VECTOR			0xf6
> >  
> > -#define UV_BAU_MESSAGE			0xea
> > +#define UV_BAU_MESSAGE			0xf5
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * Self IPI vector for machine checks
> >   */
> > -#define MCE_SELF_VECTOR			0xeb
> > +#define MCE_SELF_VECTOR			0xf4
> >  
> >  /* Xen vector callback to receive events in a HVM domain */
> > -#define XEN_HVM_EVTCHN_CALLBACK		0xe9
> > +#define XEN_HVM_EVTCHN_CALLBACK		0xf3
> > +
> 
>  Hi Li, this is not just a cleanup -- irq priority were changed as
> well, but I suppose it's harmless ;)
I didn't change the local apic timer vector because the comments say the
priority is important. For others, I do suppose it's harmless.