From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/12] rcu: update documentation/comments for Lai's adoption patch
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:05:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289095532-5398-10-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101107020507.GA4974@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Lai's RCU-callback immediate-adoption patch changes the RCU tracing
output, so update tracing.txt. Also update a few comments to clarify
the synchronization design.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | 12 ++++--------
kernel/rcutree.c | 10 ++++++----
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
index ff6d3f1..6a8c73f 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ o "ci" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been invoked for
been registered in absence of CPU-hotplug activity.
o "co" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been orphaned due to
- this CPU going offline.
+ this CPU going offline. These orphaned callbacks have been moved
+ to an arbitrarily chosen online CPU.
o "ca" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been adopted due to
other CPUs going offline. Note that ci+co-ca+ql is the number of
@@ -172,12 +173,12 @@ o "gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started. It is
The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines:
-c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6 oqlen=0
+c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6
1/1 .>. 0:127 ^0
3/3 .>. 0:35 ^0 0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1 0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2 0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3
3/3f .>. 0:5 ^0 2/3 .>. 6:11 ^1 0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2 0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3 0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4 0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5 0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0 0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1 0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2 0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3 0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4 0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5 0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0 0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1 0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2 0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3 0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4 0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5 0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0 0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1 0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2 0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3
rcu_bh:
-c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0 oqlen=0
+c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0
0/1 .>. 0:127 ^0
0/3 .>. 0:35 ^0 0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1 0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2 0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3
0/3f .>. 0:5 ^0 0/3 .>. 6:11 ^1 0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2 0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3 0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4 0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5 0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0 0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1 0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2 0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3 0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4 0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5 0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0 0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1 0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2 0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3 0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4 0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5 0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0 0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1 0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2 0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3
@@ -216,11 +217,6 @@ o "fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that
exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above)
due to contention on ->fqslock.
-o "oqlen" is the number of callbacks on the "orphan" callback
- list. RCU callbacks are placed on this list by CPUs going
- offline, and are "adopted" either by the CPU helping the outgoing
- CPU or by the next rcu_barrier*() call, whichever comes first.
-
o Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct
rcu_node. Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from
root to leaves. It is best to think of the rcu_data structures
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 669d7fe..120820f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1668,7 +1668,9 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp,
* decrement rcu_barrier_cpu_count -- otherwise the first CPU
* might complete its grace period before all of the other CPUs
* did their increment, causing this function to return too
- * early.
+ * early. Note that on_each_cpu() disables irqs, which prevents
+ * any CPUs from coming online or going offline until each online
+ * CPU has queued its RCU-barrier callback.
*/
atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 1);
on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)call_rcu_func, 1);
@@ -1797,9 +1799,9 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
case CPU_DYING:
case CPU_DYING_FROZEN:
/*
- * The whole machine is "stopped" except this cpu, so we can
- * touch any data without introducing corruption. And we send
- * the callbacks to an attribute chosen online cpu.
+ * The whole machine is "stopped" except this CPU, so we can
+ * touch any data without introducing corruption. We send the
+ * dying CPU's callbacks to an arbitrarily chosen online CPU.
*/
rcu_send_cbs_to_online(&rcu_bh_state);
rcu_send_cbs_to_online(&rcu_sched_state);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 0de359b..643c8f6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ static void __cpuinit rcu_preempt_init_percpu_data(int cpu)
}
/*
- * Move preemptable DYING RCU's callbacks to other online CPU.
+ * Move preemptable RCU's callbacks from dying CPU to other online CPU.
*/
static void rcu_preempt_send_cbs_to_online(void)
{
--
1.7.0.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-07 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-07 2:05 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/12] preview of RCU patches for 2.6.38 Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/12] rcu: add priority-inversion testing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/12] rcu: move TINY_RCU from softirq to kthread Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/12] rcu: priority boosting for TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/12] rcu: add tracing for TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/12] rcu: document TINY_RCU and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/12] rcu: Distinguish between boosting and boosted Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/12] rcu: get rid of obsolete "classic" names in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu,cleanup: move synchronize_sched_expedited() out of sched.c Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/12] rcu,cleanup: simplify the code when cpu is dying Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-07 2:05 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: fix race condition in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-09 13:26 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-10 8:56 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-11-11 4:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-11 9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-11 12:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-11 12:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-07 2:05 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Make synchronize_srcu_expedited() fast if running readers Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289095532-5398-10-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®