From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755740Ab0KHWJn (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:09:43 -0500 Received: from mail.linux-iscsi.org ([67.23.28.174]:43481 "EHLO linux-iscsi.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752605Ab0KHWJm (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2010 17:09:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFCv3 00/21] TCM Core and TCM_Loop patches for v2.6.37 From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-scsi , linux-kernel , FUJITA Tomonori , Mike Christie , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , James Bottomley , Jens Axboe , Boaz Harrosh , Joel Becker In-Reply-To: <20101108214825.GA26609@infradead.org> References: <1287441313-19703-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <20101108143952.GB22121@infradead.org> <1289251207.27226.59.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <20101108214825.GA26609@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:04:29 -0800 Message-Id: <1289253869.27226.75.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 16:48 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:20:07PM -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > Hmmm, it is my understanding that seq_file is currently not available > > for configfs. Also, we never going to expect these particular calls to > > return anything close to PAGE_SIZE, so I am not sure how much of an > > issue this really is. > > Seq_file is avaible for anything where you can plug in file_operations. > If configfs doesn't allow plugging in file_operations that's a serious > deficit. If you need less than a page of data single_open provides a > simplified version of seq_file with a similar but much simpler API. Hmmm, I recall asking Joel about this at some point back in 2008 and back then I believe configfs was still limited to a PAGE_SIZE. Joel, any comments here on the usage of seq_file() w/ configfs..? > > > > - the set_configfs_dev_params method implementation contains some > > > rather nast parsing code. They look like they really should use > > > the parser.h helpers we use for mount option parsing. > > > > This code current expects the the incoming buffer to be in the > > form of 'key0=value0,key1=value1,key2=value2' etc. Assuming that > > parser.h code can handle the comma seperated values, I will look at > > getting these converted as well. > > That's exactly how mount options work. > Ok, I will get this code converted to use parser.h. --nab