From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
"czoccolo@gmail.com" <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3]cfq-iosched: schedule dispatch for noidle queue
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:58:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289271496.23014.213.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101109023919.GB29847@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 10:39 +0800, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:28:36AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> [..]
> > > > > Why do we have to wait for all requests to finish in device? Will driver
> > > > > most likely not ask for next request when 1-2 requests have completed
> > > > > and at that time we should expire the queue if queue is no more marked
> > > > > as "noidle"?
> > > > The issue is a queue is idle just because it's the last queue of the
> > > > service tree. Then a new queue is added and the idled queue should not
> > > > idle now. we should preempt the idled queue soon. does this make sense
> > > > to you?
> > >
> > > If that's the case then you should just modify should_preempt() so that
> > > addition of a new queue could preempt an empty queue which has now become
> > > noidle.
> > >
> > > You have also modified cfq_completed_request() function, which will wake
> > > up the worker thread and then try to dispatch a request. IMHO, in practice
> > > driver asks for new request almost immediately and you don't gain much
> > > by this additional wakeup.
> > >
> > > So my point being, that we increased the code complexity for no visible
> > > performance improvement also increased thread wakeups resulting in more
> > > cpu consumption.
> > Ah, you are right, we only need modify should_preempt. Updated the patch as below.
> >
>
> Thanks. Jens has already applied the patches on for-2.6.38/core branch of
> block tree. I think you shall have to generate an incremental patch
> which revert the bits introduced in cfq_completed_request().
Jens, how to handle this? if you want to an incremental patch, here it
is.
Subject: cfq-iosched: don't schedule a dispatch for a non-idle queue
Vivek suggests we don't need schedule a dispatch when an idle queue
becomes nonidle. And he is right, cfq_should_preempt already covers
the logic.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 19 +------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)
Index: linux/block/cfq-iosched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/block/cfq-iosched.c 2010-11-09 10:48:08.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/block/cfq-iosched.c 2010-11-09 10:48:44.000000000 +0800
@@ -3512,25 +3512,8 @@ static void cfq_completed_request(struct
}
}
- if (!cfqd->rq_in_driver) {
+ if (!cfqd->rq_in_driver)
cfq_schedule_dispatch(cfqd);
- return;
- }
- /*
- * A queue is idle at cfq_dispatch_requests(), but it gets noidle
- * later. We schedule a dispatch if the queue has no requests,
- * otherwise the disk is actually in idle till all requests
- * are finished even cfq_arm_slice_timer doesn't make the queue idle
- * */
- cfqq = cfqd->active_queue;
- if (!cfqq)
- return;
-
- if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cfqq->sort_list) && !cfq_should_idle(cfqd, cfqq) &&
- (!cfqd->cfq_group_idle || cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq > 1)) {
- cfq_del_timer(cfqd, cfqq);
- cfq_schedule_dispatch(cfqd);
- }
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 2:07 Shaohua Li
2010-11-08 14:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-11-08 14:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-11-09 1:31 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-09 2:15 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-11-09 2:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-11-09 2:28 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-09 2:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-11-09 2:58 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2010-11-09 13:52 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289271496.23014.213.camel@sli10-conroe \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®