From: Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@windriver.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu, dzickus@redhat.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dongdong.deng@windriver.com
Subject: [V3 PATCH] x86: avoid calling arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() at the same time on SMP
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:01:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289473307-7965-1-git-send-email-dongdong.deng@windriver.com> (raw)
The spin_lock_debug/rcu_cpu_stall detector uses
trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() to dump cpu backtrace.
Therefore it is possible that trigger_all_cpu_backtrace()
could be called at the same time on different CPUs, which
triggers and 'unknown reason NMI' warning. The following case
illustrates the problem:
CPU1 CPU2 ... CPU N
trigger_all_cpu_backtrace()
set "backtrace_mask" to cpu mask
|
generate NMI interrupts generate NMI interrupts ...
\ | /
\ | /
The "backtrace_mask" will be cleaned by the first NMI interrupt
at nmi_watchdog_tick(), then the following NMI interrupts generated
by other cpus's arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() will be took as
unknown reason NMI interrupts.
This patch uses a lock to avoid the problem, and stop the
arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() calling to avoid dumping double cpu
backtrace info when there is already a trigger_all_cpu_backtrace()
in progress.
Signed-off-by: Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
CC: x86@kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
index cefd694..bfdab3b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
@@ -26,9 +26,27 @@ u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(void)
}
#ifdef ARCH_HAS_NMI_WATCHDOG
+/* "in progress" flag of arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace */
+static unsigned long backtrace_flag;
+
void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
{
int i;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /*
+ * Have to disable irq here, as the
+ * arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() could be
+ * triggered by "spin_lock()" with irqs on.
+ */
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+
+ if (test_and_set_bit(0, &backtrace_flag))
+ /*
+ * If there is already a trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() in progress
+ * (backtrace_flag == 1), don't output double cpu dump infos.
+ */
+ goto out_restore_irq;
cpumask_copy(to_cpumask(backtrace_mask), cpu_online_mask);
@@ -41,6 +59,11 @@ void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
break;
mdelay(1);
}
+
+ clear_bit(0, &backtrace_flag);
+
+out_restore_irq:
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
static int __kprobes
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c
index c90041c..bd9cb79 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c
@@ -549,9 +549,27 @@ int do_nmi_callback(struct pt_regs *regs, int cpu)
return 0;
}
+/* "in progress" flag of arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace */
+static unsigned long backtrace_flag;
+
void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
{
int i;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /*
+ * Have to disable irq here, as the
+ * arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() could be
+ * triggered by "spin_lock()" with irqs on.
+ */
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+
+ if (test_and_set_bit(0, &backtrace_flag))
+ /*
+ * If there is already a trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() in progress
+ * (backtrace_flag == 1), don't output double cpu dump infos.
+ */
+ goto out_restore_irq;
cpumask_copy(to_cpumask(backtrace_mask), cpu_online_mask);
@@ -564,4 +582,9 @@ void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
break;
mdelay(1);
}
+
+ clear_bit(0, &backtrace_flag);
+
+out_restore_irq:
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
--
1.6.0.4
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-11 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-11 11:01 Dongdong Deng [this message]
2010-11-11 11:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-11 11:23 ` DDD
2010-11-11 12:12 ` Dongdong Deng
2010-11-11 14:34 ` Don Zickus
2010-11-11 18:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-12 2:38 ` DDD
2010-11-12 3:39 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289473307-7965-1-git-send-email-dongdong.deng@windriver.com \
--to=dongdong.deng@windriver.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®