From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932089Ab0KLTTp (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:19:45 -0500 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:38985 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932859Ab0KLTTg (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:19:36 -0500 From: Mark Brown To: Samuel Oritz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Mark Brown Subject: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: Convert WM8994 to new irq_ interrupt methods Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:19:32 +0000 Message-Id: <1289589572-19261-3-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.1 In-Reply-To: <1289589572-19261-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1289589572-19261-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kernel 2.6.37 adds new interrupt methods which take a struct irq_data rather than an irq number. Convert over to these as they will become mandatory in future. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/mfd/wm8994-irq.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm8994-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/wm8994-irq.c index 8400eb1..6259884 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/wm8994-irq.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/wm8994-irq.c @@ -156,16 +156,16 @@ static inline struct wm8994_irq_data *irq_to_wm8994_irq(struct wm8994 *wm8994, return &wm8994_irqs[irq - wm8994->irq_base]; } -static void wm8994_irq_lock(unsigned int irq) +static void wm8994_irq_lock(struct irq_data *data) { - struct wm8994 *wm8994 = get_irq_chip_data(irq); + struct wm8994 *wm8994 = data->chip_data; mutex_lock(&wm8994->irq_lock); } -static void wm8994_irq_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq) +static void wm8994_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data) { - struct wm8994 *wm8994 = get_irq_chip_data(irq); + struct wm8994 *wm8994 = data->chip_data; int i; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wm8994->irq_masks_cur); i++) { @@ -182,28 +182,30 @@ static void wm8994_irq_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq) mutex_unlock(&wm8994->irq_lock); } -static void wm8994_irq_unmask(unsigned int irq) +static void wm8994_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data) { - struct wm8994 *wm8994 = get_irq_chip_data(irq); - struct wm8994_irq_data *irq_data = irq_to_wm8994_irq(wm8994, irq); + struct wm8994 *wm8994 = data->chip_data; + struct wm8994_irq_data *irq_data = irq_to_wm8994_irq(wm8994, + data->irq); wm8994->irq_masks_cur[irq_data->reg - 1] &= ~irq_data->mask; } -static void wm8994_irq_mask(unsigned int irq) +static void wm8994_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data) { - struct wm8994 *wm8994 = get_irq_chip_data(irq); - struct wm8994_irq_data *irq_data = irq_to_wm8994_irq(wm8994, irq); + struct wm8994 *wm8994 = data->chip_data; + struct wm8994_irq_data *irq_data = irq_to_wm8994_irq(wm8994, + data->irq); wm8994->irq_masks_cur[irq_data->reg - 1] |= irq_data->mask; } static struct irq_chip wm8994_irq_chip = { - .name = "wm8994", - .bus_lock = wm8994_irq_lock, - .bus_sync_unlock = wm8994_irq_sync_unlock, - .mask = wm8994_irq_mask, - .unmask = wm8994_irq_unmask, + .name = "wm8994", + .irq_bus_lock = wm8994_irq_lock, + .irq_bus_sync_unlock = wm8994_irq_sync_unlock, + .irq_mask = wm8994_irq_mask, + .irq_unmask = wm8994_irq_unmask, }; /* The processing of the primary interrupt occurs in a thread so that -- 1.7.1