From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756347Ab0KXUN4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:13:56 -0500 Received: from [71.74.56.122] ([71.74.56.122]:62900 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751389Ab0KXUNz (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:13:55 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kXGwZUU/u1JTMRv8Axk4W0omja+vfTT+sGlOkodD8F8= c=1 sm=0 a=yZSwoSqacEEA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=Rxjk4AdAKUsRu0J1G1oA:9 a=hwGcHegxw6uK3kaGS4AA:7 a=4CvYJ8z69y7-rkTnFZuChDN3XAwA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=jeBq3FmKZ4MA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [PATCH] isdn: icn: Fix stack overflow bug From: Steven Rostedt To: David Miller Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isdn@linux-pingi.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <20101124.112042.179943893.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1290573578.30543.461.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1290573987.30543.462.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20101124.112042.179943893.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:13:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1290629611.30543.704.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 11:20 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Steven Rostedt > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:46:27 -0500 > > > > > Note, the subject should really be: > > > > [PATCH] isdn: icn: Fix stack corruption bug. > > Applied. Thanks, > > Please CC: isdn patches to netdev@vger.kernel.org in the future as per > "ISDN SUBSYSTEM" in MAINTAINERS. Patches sent only to the ISDN list > and Karsten are likely to not get looked at for weeks if not longer. OK, will do. That's what I get for sending patches when I'm tired. I only saw the first mailing list. I didn't even notice the netdev one. And I also forgot to add the [PATCH] to the original subject. I wrote the patch while still awake, but ran it through a few more tests just to make sure it worked. Forgot about it, and then when I was done with my normal job, I decided to send it out (making change log and everything). -- Steve