mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: roland@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	"rjw@sisk.plpavel"@ucw.cz
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/14] ptrace: make group stop notification reliable against ptrace
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:49:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290768569-16224-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290768569-16224-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Group stop notifications are unreliable if one or more tasks of the
task group are being ptraced.  If a ptraced task ends up finishing a
group stop, the notification is sent to the ptracer and the real
parent never gets notified.

This patch adds a new signal flag SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP which is set on
group stop completion and cleared after notification to the real
parent or together with other stopped flags on SIGCONT/KILL.  This
guarantees that the real parent is notified correctly regardless of
ptrace.  If a ptraced task is the last task to stop, the notification
is postponed till ptrace detach or canceled if SIGCONT/KILL is
received inbetween.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |    2 ++
 kernel/signal.c       |   20 +++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e78b1e5..3e40761 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -653,6 +653,8 @@ struct signal_struct {
 
 #define SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE	0x00000040 /* for init: ignore fatal signals */
 
+#define SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP	0x00000100 /* notify parent of group stop */
+
 /* If true, all threads except ->group_exit_task have pending SIGKILL */
 static inline int signal_group_exit(const struct signal_struct *sig)
 {
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index c084ea8..f2da456 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1739,7 +1739,6 @@ void ptrace_notify(int exit_code)
 static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
 {
 	struct signal_struct *sig = current->signal;
-	int notify = 0;
 
 	if (!(current->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING)) {
 		unsigned int gstop = GROUP_STOP_PENDING | GROUP_STOP_CONSUME;
@@ -1780,8 +1779,9 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
 	 */
 	if (sig->group_stop_count == 1 &&
 	    (current->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_CONSUME))
-		notify = CLD_STOPPED;
-	notify = tracehook_notify_jctl(notify, CLD_STOPPED);
+		tracehook_notify_jctl(CLD_STOPPED, CLD_STOPPED);
+	else
+		tracehook_notify_jctl(0, CLD_STOPPED);
 	/*
 	 * tracehook_notify_jctl() can drop and reacquire siglock, so
 	 * we test GROUP_STOP_PENDING again.  If SIGCONT or SIGKILL
@@ -1791,20 +1791,26 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	if (consume_group_stop())
-		sig->flags = SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED;
+		sig->flags = SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED | SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP;
 retry:
 	current->exit_code = sig->group_exit_code;
 	current->group_stop &= ~GROUP_STOP_PENDING;
 	__set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED);
 
 	if (likely(!task_ptrace(current))) {
+		bool do_notify = false;
+
+		if (sig->flags & SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP) {
+			sig->flags &= ~SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP;
+			do_notify = true;
+		}
+
 		spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 
-		if (notify) {
+		if (do_notify) {
 			read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
-			do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, notify);
+			do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, CLD_STOPPED);
 			read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
-			notify = 0;
 		}
 
 		/* Now we don't run again until woken by SIGCONT or SIGKILL */
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-26 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-26 10:49 [PATCHSET RFC] ptrace,signal: sane interaction between ptrace and job control signals Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 01/14] signal: fix SIGCONT notification code Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 13:49   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-01  1:43   ` Roland McGrath
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 02/14] freezer: fix a race during freezing of TASK_STOPPED tasks Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 19:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-11-26 19:59     ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 03/14] freezer: remove superflous try_to_freeze() loop in do_signal_stop() Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 19:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 04/14] signal: don't notify parent if not stopping after tracehook_notify_jctl() " Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 14:46   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-26 15:04     ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 05/14] signal: fix premature completion of group stop when interfered by ptrace Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 15:40   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-26 16:03     ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 06/14] signal: use GROUP_STOP_PENDING to avoid stopping multiple times for a single group stop Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 17:59   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-26 18:39     ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 11:40   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-11-28 19:07     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-29 13:38       ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 07/14] ptrace: add @why to ptrace_stop() Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 08/14] ptrace: make do_signal_stop() use ptrace_stop() if the task is being ptraced Tejun Heo
2010-11-28 19:54   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-28 20:22     ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-28 20:53       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 09/14] ptrace: clean transitions between TASK_STOPPED and TRACED Tejun Heo
2010-11-28 20:25   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-28 20:51     ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-29 13:48     ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 10/14] ptrace: don't consume group count from ptrace_stop() Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-11-28 20:30   ` [PATCH 11/14] ptrace: make group stop notification reliable against ptrace Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-29 13:52     ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 12/14] ptrace: reorganize __ptrace_unlink() and ptrace_untrace() Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 13/14] ptrace: make SIGCONT notification reliable against ptrace Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 14/14] ptrace: remove the extra wake_up_process() from ptrace_detach() Tejun Heo
2010-11-28 20:44   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-29 13:55     ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:55 ` [PATCHSET RFC] ptrace,signal: sane interaction between ptrace and job control signals Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1290768569-16224-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc="rjw@sisk.plpavel"@ucw.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome