mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Victor van der Veen <vvdveen@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: When was ASLR introduced in the Linux kernel?
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:15:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291119324.2904.51.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291117660.3206.11.camel@D430>

Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 12:47 +0100, Victor van der Veen a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> - When was ASLR introduced in the Linux kernel (not PaX/ExecShield)? 
> - When was ASLR enabled by default? 
> - What's the current state of ASLR in the Linux kernel? Is it still
> under development? Or should we rely on the PaX/ExecShield patches?
> 
> Wikipedia states that "a weak form of ASLR exists in the linux kernel
> since version 2.6.12 (June 2005)", but I could not find any proof that
> backs this up. I grepped changelogs of the entire 2.6 kernel, but I was
> unable to find any relevant information. Grepping the source code did
> not help either. Any more Google results all quote the same wikipedia
> line. 
> 

randomize-va-space:

echo  val >/proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space


vi +391 Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt

This option can be used to select the type of process address
space randomization that is used in the system, for architectures
that support this feature.

0 - Turn the process address space randomization off.  This is the
    default for architectures that do not support this feature anyways,
    and kernels that are booted with the "norandmaps" parameter.

1 - Make the addresses of mmap base, stack and VDSO page randomized.
    This, among other things, implies that shared libraries will be
    loaded to random addresses.  Also for PIE-linked binaries, the
    location of code start is randomized.  This is the default if the
    CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK option is enabled.

2 - Additionally enable heap randomization.  This is the default if
    CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is disabled.

    There are a few legacy applications out there (such as some ancient
    versions of libc.so.5 from 1996) that assume that brk area starts
    just after the end of the code+bss.  These applications break when
    start of the brk area is randomized.  There are however no known
    non-legacy applications that would be broken this way, so for most
    systems it is safe to choose full randomization.

    Systems with ancient and/or broken binaries should be configured
    with CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK enabled, which excludes the heap from process
    address space randomization.




  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-30 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-30 11:47 Victor van der Veen
2010-11-30 12:15 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-11-30 17:50   ` Victor van der Veen
2010-11-30 18:10     ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1291119324.2904.51.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vvdveen@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®