mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: videobuf2: publish buffers in bufs_bitmap under mmap_lock
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 09:50:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <129153ba-7e5e-470d-86a7-78c346c03d6c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102-vb2-mmap_lock-v1-1-fe550fe03ed8@chromium.org>

Hi Ricardo,

Thank you for the patch, some comments below.

On 02/11/2026 18:12, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> vb2_mmap() only takes q->mmap_lock, not the main queue lock (q->lock).
> To keep vb2_mmap() safe, newly allocated buffers must not become visible
> in vb2_get_buffer() until they are fully initialized and q->mmap_lock is
> held.
> 
> Commit a286b0837e13 ("media: core: Add bitmap manage bufs array entries")
> started setting q->bufs_bitmap inside __vb2_queue_alloc() before buffer
> memory is allocated and without holding q->mmap_lock. As a result:
> 
> - A concurrent mmap() can find a half-initialized buffer, and if buffer
>   allocation or .buf_init() fails, __vb2_queue_alloc() frees that buffer
>   without holding q->mmap_lock, causing a use-after-free in vb2_mmap().
> - If fewer buffers are allocated than requested, they are already
>   counted as active in q->bufs_bitmap before .queue_setup() checks
>   whether the smaller count is acceptable.
> 
> Fix this by keeping new buffers only in q->bufs[] during allocation and
> setting their bits in q->bufs_bitmap under q->mmap_lock once allocation
> and .queue_setup() succeed. Add a memory barrier pair on q->bufs_bitmap
> so lockless vb2_get_buffer() readers also see fully initialized buffers,
> and let __vb2_queue_free() read q->bufs[] directly when cleaning up
> unexposed buffers.
> 
> Fixes: a286b0837e13 ("media: core: Add bitmap manage bufs array entries")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> ---
> This patch was generated by an LLM, but supervised and reviewed by a
> human (not the most handsome human, but a human).
> ---
>  drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/media/videobuf2-core.h                  | 13 +++-
>  2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> index b0a6084f1757..185393078ce3 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> @@ -427,19 +427,36 @@ static void init_buffer_cache_hints(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * vb2_queue_add_buffer() - add a buffer to a queue
> - * @q:	pointer to &struct vb2_queue with videobuf2 queue.
> - * @vb:	pointer to &struct vb2_buffer to be added to the queue.
> - * @index: index where add vb2_buffer in the queue
> + * vb2_queue_add_buffers() - publish buffers staged by __vb2_queue_alloc()
> + * @q:		pointer to &struct vb2_queue with videobuf2 queue.
> + * @start:	index of the first buffer to publish.
> + * @count:	number of buffers to publish.
> + *
> + * Set the @q->bufs_bitmap bits of the @count fully initialized buffers that
> + * __vb2_queue_alloc() stored in @q->bufs[] starting at @start, which makes
> + * them visible to vb2_get_buffer().
>   */
> -static void vb2_queue_add_buffer(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb, unsigned int index)
> +static void vb2_queue_add_buffers(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int start,
> +				  unsigned int count)
>  {
> -	WARN_ON(index >= q->max_num_buffers || test_bit(index, q->bufs_bitmap) || vb->vb2_queue);
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&q->mmap_lock);
>  
> -	q->bufs[index] = vb;
> -	vb->index = index;
> -	vb->vb2_queue = q;
> -	set_bit(index, q->bufs_bitmap);
> +	/*
> +	 * Order the buffer initialization and the q->bufs[] stores done by
> +	 * __vb2_queue_alloc() before the bits that publish them. Pairs with
> +	 * test_bit_acquire() in vb2_get_buffer(), which is also called
> +	 * without q->lock or q->mmap_lock held, e.g. by vb2_find_buffer()
> +	 * from a mem2mem .device_run().
> +	 */
> +	smp_mb__before_atomic();

Move the memory barrier changes to a separate patch. I'm not at all certain these
are needed. I noticed before that LLMs are very 'generous' with such things and
I am not sure they know what they are doing.

> +	for (i = start; i < start + count; i++) {
> +		if (WARN_ON(i >= q->max_num_buffers || !q->bufs[i] ||
> +			    test_bit(i, q->bufs_bitmap)))
> +			continue;
> +		set_bit(i, q->bufs_bitmap);
> +	}

So if I understand it correctly, the root issue is that vb2_queue_add_buffer
sets the bit in bufs_bitmap, even though __vb2_queue_alloc() might free it
again.

I think these changes are a bit too extensive. How about just dropping the
set_bit from vb2_queue_add_buffer()? And at the end of the reqbufs/create_bufs
function call bitmap_set() to update bufs_bitmap?

>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -448,6 +465,8 @@ static void vb2_queue_add_buffer(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb, uns
>   */
>  static void vb2_queue_remove_buffer(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>  {
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&vb->vb2_queue->mmap_lock);

It doesn't hurt to have these asserts. But put these in a separate patch please.

> +
>  	clear_bit(vb->index, vb->vb2_queue->bufs_bitmap);
>  	vb->vb2_queue->bufs[vb->index] = NULL;
>  	vb->vb2_queue = NULL;
> @@ -460,6 +479,11 @@ static void vb2_queue_remove_buffer(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
>   * @first_index: index of the first created buffer, all newly allocated buffers
>   *		 have indices in the range [first_index..first_index+count-1]
>   *
> + * The allocated buffers are stored in q->bufs[] but not published in
> + * q->bufs_bitmap: the caller must either publish them with
> + * vb2_queue_add_buffers() or free them with __vb2_queue_free(), both under
> + * q->mmap_lock.
> + *
>   * Returns the number of buffers successfully allocated.
>   */
>  static int __vb2_queue_alloc(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
> @@ -506,7 +530,9 @@ static int __vb2_queue_alloc(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
>  		}
>  
>  		vb->state = VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED;
> +		vb->vb2_queue = q;
>  		vb->num_planes = num_planes;
> +		vb->index = index + buffer;
>  		vb->type = q->type;
>  		vb->memory = memory;
>  		init_buffer_cache_hints(q, vb);
> @@ -515,7 +541,6 @@ static int __vb2_queue_alloc(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
>  			vb->planes[plane].min_length = plane_sizes[plane];
>  		}
>  
> -		vb2_queue_add_buffer(q, vb, index++);
>  		call_void_bufop(q, init_buffer, vb);
>  
>  		/* Allocate video buffer memory for the MMAP type */
> @@ -524,7 +549,6 @@ static int __vb2_queue_alloc(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
>  			if (ret) {
>  				dprintk(q, 1, "failed allocating memory for buffer %d\n",
>  					buffer);
> -				vb2_queue_remove_buffer(vb);
>  				kfree(vb);
>  				break;
>  			}
> @@ -539,11 +563,20 @@ static int __vb2_queue_alloc(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
>  				dprintk(q, 1, "buffer %d %p initialization failed\n",
>  					buffer, vb);
>  				__vb2_buf_mem_free(vb);
> -				vb2_queue_remove_buffer(vb);
>  				kfree(vb);
>  				break;
>  			}
>  		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Stage the initialized buffer in q->bufs[]; it becomes visible
> +		 * to vb2_get_buffer() only after vb2_queue_add_buffers() sets
> +		 * its bit in q->bufs_bitmap under q->mmap_lock.
> +		 */
> +		WARN_ON(vb->index >= q->max_num_buffers ||
> +			q->bufs[vb->index] ||
> +			test_bit(vb->index, q->bufs_bitmap));
> +		q->bufs[vb->index] = vb;
>  	}
>  
>  	dprintk(q, 3, "allocated %d buffers, %d plane(s) each\n",
> @@ -562,7 +595,8 @@ static void __vb2_free_mem(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int start, unsigned int
>  	struct vb2_buffer *vb;
>  
>  	for (i = start; i < start + count; i++) {
> -		vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, i);
> +		/* See __vb2_queue_free() for why vb2_get_buffer() isn't used */
> +		vb = q->bufs[i];
>  		if (!vb)
>  			continue;
>  
> @@ -580,6 +614,11 @@ static void __vb2_free_mem(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int start, unsigned int
>   * __vb2_queue_free() - free @count buffers from @start index of the queue - video memory and
>   * related information, if no buffers are left return the queue to an
>   * uninitialized state. Might be called even if the queue has already been freed.
> + *
> + * Buffers are looked up directly in q->bufs[] instead of through
> + * vb2_get_buffer() so that buffers staged by __vb2_queue_alloc() that were
> + * never published in q->bufs_bitmap (because a later .queue_setup() call
> + * rejected the allocated number of buffers) are freed as well.
>   */
>  static void __vb2_queue_free(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int start, unsigned int count)
>  {
> @@ -587,9 +626,19 @@ static void __vb2_queue_free(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int start, unsigned i
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&q->mmap_lock);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * No buffers were ever allocated (e.g. REQBUFS(0) on a fresh queue),
> +	 * only the queue state needs to be reset.
> +	 */
> +	if (!q->bufs) {
> +		q->memory = VB2_MEMORY_UNKNOWN;
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->queued_list);
> +		return;
> +	}

This change looks dubious. It doesn't appear to have anything to do with the actual
change. If it is meant as an optimization, then I would just drop this: this situation
almost never happens in practice, so it just adds code for no benefit.

> +
>  	/* Call driver-provided cleanup function for each buffer, if provided */
>  	for (i = start; i < start + count; i++) {
> -		struct vb2_buffer *vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, i);
> +		struct vb2_buffer *vb = q->bufs[i];
>  
>  		if (vb && vb->planes[0].mem_priv)
>  			call_void_vb_qop(vb, buf_cleanup, vb);
> @@ -624,7 +673,7 @@ static void __vb2_queue_free(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int start, unsigned i
>  		q->cnt_unprepare_streaming = 0;
>  	}
>  	for (i = start; i < start + count; i++) {
> -		struct vb2_buffer *vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, i);
> +		struct vb2_buffer *vb = q->bufs[i];
>  		bool unbalanced;
>  
>  		if (!vb)
> @@ -676,7 +725,7 @@ static void __vb2_queue_free(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int start, unsigned i
>  
>  	/* Free vb2 buffers */
>  	for (i = start; i < start + count; i++) {
> -		struct vb2_buffer *vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, i);
> +		struct vb2_buffer *vb = q->bufs[i];
>  
>  		if (!vb)
>  			continue;
> @@ -1000,14 +1049,16 @@ int vb2_core_reqbufs(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
>  
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		/*
> -		 * Note: __vb2_queue_free() will subtract 'allocated_buffers'
> -		 * from already queued buffers and it will reset q->memory to
> +		 * Note: the buffers allocated by __vb2_queue_alloc() were never
> +		 * published in q->bufs_bitmap, __vb2_queue_free() frees them
> +		 * straight from q->bufs[] and resets q->memory to
>  		 * VB2_MEMORY_UNKNOWN.
>  		 */
>  		__vb2_queue_free(q, first_index, allocated_buffers);
>  		mutex_unlock(&q->mmap_lock);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
> +	vb2_queue_add_buffers(q, first_index, allocated_buffers);
>  	mutex_unlock(&q->mmap_lock);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -1125,14 +1176,16 @@ int vb2_core_create_bufs(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
>  
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		/*
> -		 * Note: __vb2_queue_free() will subtract 'allocated_buffers'
> -		 * from already queued buffers and it will reset q->memory to
> -		 * VB2_MEMORY_UNKNOWN.
> +		 * Note: the buffers allocated by __vb2_queue_alloc() were never
> +		 * published in q->bufs_bitmap, __vb2_queue_free() frees them
> +		 * straight from q->bufs[] and resets q->memory to
> +		 * VB2_MEMORY_UNKNOWN if no buffers are left.
>  		 */
>  		__vb2_queue_free(q, *first_index, allocated_buffers);
>  		mutex_unlock(&q->mmap_lock);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
> +	vb2_queue_add_buffers(q, *first_index, allocated_buffers);
>  	mutex_unlock(&q->mmap_lock);
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> index 4b4f4c15c53a..0b32ac7bc8fc 100644
> --- a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> +++ b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> @@ -565,8 +565,11 @@ struct vb2_buf_ops {
>   * @memory:	current memory type used
>   * @dma_dir:	DMA mapping direction.
>   * @bufs:	videobuf2 buffer structures. If it is non-NULL then
> - *		bufs_bitmap is also non-NULL.
> - * @bufs_bitmap: bitmap tracking whether each bufs[] entry is used
> + *		bufs_bitmap is also non-NULL. __vb2_queue_alloc() fills in
> + *		an entry before its bit is set in bufs_bitmap, so buffers
> + *		must be looked up with vb2_get_buffer().
> + * @bufs_bitmap: bitmap tracking which bufs[] entries hold a fully
> + *		initialized buffer. Bits are set and cleared under @mmap_lock.
>   * @max_num_buffers: upper limit of number of allocated/used buffers.
>   *		     If set to 0 v4l2 core will change it VB2_MAX_FRAME
>   *		     for backward compatibility.
> @@ -1286,7 +1289,11 @@ static inline struct vb2_buffer *vb2_get_buffer(struct vb2_queue *q,
>  	if (index >= q->max_num_buffers)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	if (test_bit(index, q->bufs_bitmap))
> +	/*
> +	 * A set bit guarantees that the buffer is fully initialized, pairs
> +	 * with smp_mb__before_atomic() in vb2_queue_add_buffers().
> +	 */
> +	if (test_bit_acquire(index, q->bufs_bitmap))
>  		return q->bufs[index];
>  	return NULL;
>  }

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> ---
> base-commit: 6628e7d4c6b25c8d18f1345e3a20d21829aae7e4
> change-id: 20261102-vb2-mmap_lock-959e0cc4edb3
> 
> Best regards,


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-02 17:12 Ricardo Ribalda
2026-11-03  8:50 ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2026-11-03 10:48   ` Ricardo Ribalda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=129153ba-7e5e-470d-86a7-78c346c03d6c@kernel.org \
    --to=hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®