Re: [patch 1/4] vt-d: quirk for masking vtd spec errors to platform error handling logic

[Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>]

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 12:44 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:26:30 -0800
> Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 09:27 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > Can we make these registers and bits a bit more self-documenting (i.e.
> > > #defines for both, maybe along with other useful bit definitions for
> > > this reg)? Also, "error" is misspelled as "erorr" above. :)
> > 
> > Thanks for the review. Appended the updated patch. I haven't used
> > #defines for the pci-id's, as the first one (IOH) is used by several
> > chipsets and the second one is not named yet.
> 
> Is there a bug # that should be referenced in the commit log?  Any
> tested-bys to add?

There is no kernel.org bug# but there are multiple bugs with different
OSV's. And hence didn't care to mention to the bug #

Please add:

Reported-by: Max Asbock <masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Acked-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>

thanks,
suresh