From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751392Ab1ADK4B (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 05:56:01 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:40060 "EHLO mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750840Ab1ADKz7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 05:55:59 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=w6B0SYDxHWaMZlMY1ybvMHi8l4GSw643f+yuLyViTw50UieZLptP38SGmusziESpOS JrtBZZeNW4k+pezYaNN32SEQCgVagQIcKS0GQGygD2UZzI6XiogecvTd1Kjx6l8zKKzi giEZNmaP3DH0uPStIDY89rI3QaUyuNU8X0NQM= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: add __rcu annotation From: Eric Dumazet To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Lai Jiangshan , Ingo Molnar , "Paul E. McKenney" , Arnd Bergmann , LKML In-Reply-To: <1294136267.2016.105.camel@laptop> References: <4D22D4EE.3020604@cn.fujitsu.com> <1294136267.2016.105.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:55:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1294138545.3579.53.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le mardi 04 janvier 2011 à 11:17 +0100, Peter Zijlstra a écrit : > I'm really starting to detest sparse (lock annotations), it keeps adding > these annotations, but does it ever catch an actual bug? Actually I caught at least one bug in networking (FIB code ?) thanks to these __rcu annotations ;) Cannot remember the exact bug, sorry ;)