From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752427Ab1ADRVY (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:21:24 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:29502 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751226Ab1ADRVW (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:21:22 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,273,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="129534606" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/8] xen/mmu: Add the notion of identity (1-1) mapping. From: Ian Campbell To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jn Beulich , "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" , "hpa@zytor.com" In-Reply-To: <1294160359.3831.579.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <1293738517-7287-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <1293738517-7287-3-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <1294160028.3831.563.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1294160359.3831.579.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:20:23 +0000 Message-ID: <1294161623.3831.643.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:59 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:53 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > If I do "__set_phys_to_machine(X, X)" where X happens to currently > > correspond to p2m_mid_missing won't that cause all pfn entries in the > > range covered by p2m_top[topidx] (i.e. quite a few, like 512^2 pages > > or > > something) to switch from missing to identity? Similarly for > > p2m_top[topidx][mididx]? > > > > Perhaps ranges of identity bits are often well aligned with the > > boundaries in the p2m 3-level tree but wouldn't that just be > > coincidence? > > I wonder if it would make sense to have a debugfs file which exports the > p2m, for the purposes of eye-balling it for this sort of issue? > comparing to the e820 etc... > > Maybe the whole thing in raw form would be overkill but spitting out a > list of ranges of identity, invalid, normal pages, plus annotation > regarding whether those come from a p2m_mid_identity style page or a > leaf node, might be occasionally useful. I should have read patch 5/8 first...