From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753347Ab1AQONe (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:13:34 -0500 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:46052 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751662Ab1AQONd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:13:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [wake_afine fixes/improvements 2/3] sched: clean up task_hot() From: Peter Zijlstra To: Paul Turner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Mike Galbraith , Nick Piggin , Srivatsa Vaddagiri In-Reply-To: <20110115015817.160235155@google.com> References: <20110115015749.692623529@google.com> <20110115015817.160235155@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:14:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1295273644.30950.121.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 17:57 -0800, Paul Turner wrote: > plain text document attachment (no_hot_sd.patch) > We no longer compute per-domain migration costs or have use for task_hot() > external to the fair scheduling class. Ok, so this a mostly a pure code move (aside from removing the unused sd argument). I do seem to remember that various folks played around with bringing the per sd cache refill cost back.. any conclusion on that? (not really a big point, we can easily add the argument back when needed)