From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] perf evlist: Support non overwrite mode in perf_evlist__read_on_cpu
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:19:15 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296339559-20914-4-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296339559-20914-1-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org>
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
I.e. stash the overwrite mode in struct perf_evlist and act accordingly
in perf_evlist__read_on_cpu, not checking for overwrites and touching
the tail after consuming one event, like perf record does, for instance.
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
tools/perf/util/evlist.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
index df0610e..b498eec 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
@@ -116,24 +116,25 @@ event_t *perf_evlist__read_on_cpu(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int cpu)
unsigned int old = md->prev;
unsigned char *data = md->base + page_size;
event_t *event = NULL;
- int diff;
-
- /*
- * If we're further behind than half the buffer, there's a chance
- * the writer will bite our tail and mess up the samples under us.
- *
- * If we somehow ended up ahead of the head, we got messed up.
- *
- * In either case, truncate and restart at head.
- */
- diff = head - old;
- if (diff > md->mask / 2 || diff < 0) {
- fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: failed to keep up with mmap data.\n");
+ if (evlist->overwrite) {
/*
- * head points to a known good entry, start there.
+ * If we're further behind than half the buffer, there's a chance
+ * the writer will bite our tail and mess up the samples under us.
+ *
+ * If we somehow ended up ahead of the head, we got messed up.
+ *
+ * In either case, truncate and restart at head.
*/
- old = head;
+ int diff = head - old;
+ if (diff > md->mask / 2 || diff < 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: failed to keep up with mmap data.\n");
+
+ /*
+ * head points to a known good entry, start there.
+ */
+ old = head;
+ }
}
if (old != head) {
@@ -166,5 +167,9 @@ event_t *perf_evlist__read_on_cpu(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int cpu)
}
md->prev = old;
+
+ if (!evlist->overwrite)
+ perf_mmap__write_tail(md, old);
+
return event;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
index acbe48e..2706ae4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct perf_evlist {
int nr_entries;
int nr_fds;
int mmap_len;
+ bool overwrite;
event_t event_copy;
struct perf_mmap *mmap;
struct pollfd *pollfd;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 76ab553..f98b3e5 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ int perf_evlist__mmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist, struct cpu_map *cpus,
perf_evlist__alloc_pollfd(evlist, cpus->nr, threads->nr) < 0)
return -ENOMEM;
+ evlist->overwrite = overwrite;
evlist->mmap_len = (pages + 1) * page_size;
first_evsel = list_entry(evlist->entries.next, struct perf_evsel, node);
--
1.6.2.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-29 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-29 22:19 [GIT PULL 0/7] perf/core improvements Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf record: No need to check for overwrites Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf events: Account PERF_RECORD_LOST events in event__process Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf top: Switch to non overwrite mode Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf tools: Rename 'struct sample_data' to 'struct perf_sample' Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf tools: Kill event_t typedef, use 'union perf_event' instead Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf tools: Initial python binding Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-30 0:39 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-01-30 13:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-31 10:37 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296339559-20914-4-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org \
--to=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®