From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, mm: avoid stale tlb entries by clearing prev mm_cpumask after switching mm
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:55:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296698151.4418.464.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2d3n9ap1y.fsf@firstfloor.org>
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 17:23 -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> writes:
>
> > For the prev mm that is handing over the cpu to another mm, clear the cpu
> > from the mm_cpumask(prev) after the cr3 is changed.
> >
> > Otherwise, clearing the mm_cpumask early will avoid the flush tlb IPI's while
> > the cr3 and TLB's are still pointing to the prev mm. And this window can lead
> > to the stale (global) TLB entries.
> >
> > Marking it for -stable, though we haven't seen any reported failure that
> > can be attributed to this.
>
> Would it be safer to add a memory barrier between the load_cr3 and the
> cpumask_clear_cpu()? As far as I can see cpumask_clear_cpu doesn't
> imply a general one and load_cr3 doesn't either. There's this
> __force_order hack in system.h, but I don't think it will enforce
> order here.
I thought "asm volatile" is going to take care of that.
If not, then we have issues even today. no?
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 20:07 Suresh Siddha
2011-02-03 1:23 ` Andi Kleen
2011-02-03 1:55 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2011-02-03 2:15 ` Andi Kleen
2011-02-03 4:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-03 4:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-03 1:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-03 4:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-03 18:27 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-02-03 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-03 19:34 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-02-03 19:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-03 20:20 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-02-03 21:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-03 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-03 21:39 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] <BLU157-w495F35A445E063E33DC9E8DAAC0@phx.gbl>
[not found] ` <BLU157-w41A610FD3413183801060CDAAC0@phx.gbl>
[not found] ` <BLU157-w548B9D2F8EDD8CA9DB6CD3DAAC0@phx.gbl>
2011-04-15 11:58 ` MaoXiaoyun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296698151.4418.464.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®