From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm: compaction: simplify should_compact_retry()
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 14:58:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296cd8a-fd28-98fe-b132-c168d46e3202@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602144705.GB161817@cmpxchg.org>
On 6/2/23 16:47, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 12:38:07PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 03:03:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> > I think you simplified this part too much, so now once it runs out of
>> > retries, it will return false, while previously it would increase the priority.
>
> Here is the delta fix. If this looks good to everybody, can you please
> fold this into the patch you have in tree? Thanks!
>
> ---
> From 4b9429f9ef04fcb7bb5ffae0db8ea113b26d097b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 16:02:37 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: compaction: simplify should_compact_retry() fix
>
> Vlastimil points out an unintended change. Previously when hitting
> max_retries we'd bump the priority level and restart the loop. Now we
> bail out and fail instead. Restore the original behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
For the 2/5 +fix
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 72660e924b95..e7d7db36582b 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3768,6 +3768,15 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int order, int alloc_flags,
> if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> return false;
>
> + /*
> + * Compaction was skipped due to a lack of free order-0
> + * migration targets. Continue if reclaim can help.
> + */
> + if (compact_result == COMPACT_SKIPPED) {
> + ret = compaction_zonelist_suitable(ac, order, alloc_flags);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Compaction managed to coalesce some page blocks, but the
> * allocation failed presumably due to a race. Retry some.
> @@ -3785,17 +3794,10 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int order, int alloc_flags,
> if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
> max_retries /= 4;
>
> - ret = ++(*compaction_retries) <= max_retries;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Compaction was skipped due to a lack of free order-0
> - * migration targets. Continue if reclaim can help.
> - */
> - if (compact_result == COMPACT_SKIPPED) {
> - ret = compaction_zonelist_suitable(ac, order, alloc_flags);
> - goto out;
> + if (++(*compaction_retries) <= max_retries) {
> + ret = true;
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-06 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-19 12:39 [PATCH 0/5] mm: compaction: cleanups & simplifications Johannes Weiner
2023-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: compaction: remove compaction result helpers Johannes Weiner
2023-05-29 9:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: compaction: simplify should_compact_retry() Johannes Weiner
2023-05-29 13:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-05-29 16:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-06-02 14:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-06-06 12:58 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2023-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: compaction: refactor __compaction_suitable() Johannes Weiner
2023-05-29 17:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-06-02 14:49 ` Johannes Weiner
2023-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: compaction: remove unnecessary is_via_compact_memory() checks Johannes Weiner
2023-05-29 17:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-05-19 12:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: compaction: drop redundant watermark check in compaction_zonelist_suitable() Johannes Weiner
2023-05-29 17:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-06-02 15:12 ` [PATCH 6/5] mm: compaction: have compaction_suitable() return bool Johannes Weiner
2023-06-06 13:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296cd8a-fd28-98fe-b132-c168d46e3202@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®