From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752471Ab1BGNSF (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:18:05 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.176]:51822 "EHLO smtp-out1.tiscali.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751984Ab1BGNSE (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:18:04 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export linux/syslog.h From: Paul Bolle To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , David Woodhouse Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:17:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201102071355.55978.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1297079503.1741.10.camel@t41.thuisdomein> <201102071355.55978.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 2.91.5 (2.91.5-4.fc15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1297084682.1741.17.camel@t41.thuisdomein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 13:55 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The comment in the header file currently starts with "Syslog internals". > If you want to export it, you should probably change that, too. That makes sense. > Further, the man page currently documents the raw numbers and should > be changed as well with the new constants. Yes, I realized that. I assumed that updating the man page should be done after this patch was accepted. Or should patches like this one be done in parallel with the patch(es) to the relevant man page(s)? Either way is fine with me. Paul