mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] XEN: Interrupt cleanups
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:26:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297182385.9388.196.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102081619410.31804@localhost6.localdomain6>

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 15:39 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:55 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > So, with the fixes to 2/4 (irq_move_irq think from yesterday) and 4/4
> > > > (below), the entire series is:
> > > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > > 
> > > Cool. So what's the best way to proceed ? That code is not yet in
> > > linus tree, right ?
> > 
> > Correct.
> > 
> > > So I guess the best way is that I add the core changes to a rc-4 based
> > > branch and you can pull it in and apply the whole xen stuff to your
> > > own tree.
> > 
> > My existing cleanup patches are in Konrad's tree (which is in linux-next
> > etc) so that probably makes most sense as a home for this series. So
> > unless Konrad has any objections I think it makes sense to pull your
> > core changes into that branch and then apply your Xen bits on top.
> > 
> > Konrad's branch with my stuff is:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/irq.rework
> > 
> > Konrad, this thread starts at <20110205200108.921707839@linutronix.de>
> > == http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1096437
> > 
> > > I base my pending patches on top of that so it wont be any problem
> > > when merging the stuff together in next or linus later.
> > 
> > I don't think there will be much trouble with overlap between these and
> > any Xen events.c changes for the next merge window but what you suggest
> > should remove the risk.
> 
> Yes, and please talk to me next time before you hack around in the
> guts of the interrupt code. I noticed just because I was skimming
> -next, and that really conflicts with major cleanups I'm doing. If
> there is a shortcoming in the generic code, then let me know.

Will do in the future, sorry about that.

Ian.

> 
> Core change is in 
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git irq/for-xen
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-08 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-05 20:08 Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-05 20:08 ` [patch 1/4] xen: Remove stale irq_chip.end Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-05 20:08 ` [patch 2/4] xen: Switch to new irq_chip functions Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-07 11:08   ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-07 11:30     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-05 20:08 ` [patch 3/4] genirq: Add IRQF_FORCE_RESUME Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-05 20:08 ` [patch 4/4] xen: Use IRQF_FORCE_RESUME Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-07 21:28 ` [patch 0/4] XEN: Interrupt cleanups Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-07 21:33   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-07 21:57     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-02-08 14:03       ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-08 14:55         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-08 15:05           ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-08 15:39             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-08 16:20               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-08 16:31                 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-08 17:33                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-08 18:39                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-08 19:05                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-09  9:27                 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-09  9:46                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-09  9:48                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-09 10:16                       ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-09  9:56                     ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-08 16:24               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-02-08 17:38                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-08 16:26               ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2011-02-07 21:56 ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1297182385.9388.196.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®